My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2500 & 2500 3%4 S Fairview St Unit# WCC01 - Plan
PBA
>
Building
>
ProjectDox
>
F
>
Fairview St
>
2500 3/4 S Fairview St Unit# WCC01
>
2500 & 2500 3%4 S Fairview St Unit# WCC01 - Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2026 5:00:14 AM
Creation date
5/16/2026 5:00:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan
Permit Number
101127134
101127138
Full Address
2500 3/4 S Fairview St Unit# WCC01
2500 S Fairview St
Street Number
2500
Street Direction
S
Street Name
Fairview
Street Suffix
St
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
November 18, 2025 <br />58.0 -ft Monoeucalyptus Structural Analysis Fairview Business Park (CLL01580) <br />TEP Project Number 353924.1184090 Page 5 <br /> <br />4) ANALYSIS RESULTS <br /> <br />Table 3 - Section Capacity (Summary) <br />Section No. Elevation (ft) Component Type Size Critical <br />Element P (K) ΦPallow (K) % <br />Capacity Pass / Fail <br />L1 58 - 16 Pole TP35.15x18x0.2188 1 -15.04 1414.00 25.4 Pass <br />L2 16 - 1 Pole TP40.837x32.9363x0.25 2 -18.05 1978.24 28.5 Pass <br /> Summary <br /> Pole (L2) 28.5 Pass <br /> RATING = 28.5 Pass <br /> <br />Table 4 - Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity <br />Notes Component Elevation <br />(ft) % Capacity Pass / Fail <br />1,2,3 Anchor Rods - 26.3 Pass <br />1,2 Base Plate - 20.1 Pass <br />1,2,4,5 Base Foundation <br />(Design Reaction Comparison) - 33.3 Pass <br /> <br />Structure Rating (max from all components) = 33.3% <br />Notes: <br />1) Rating per TIA-222-H, Section 15.5 <br />2) See additional documentation in “Appendix B - Additional Calculations” for calculations supporting the % capacity listed. <br />3) Seismic controls capacity. <br />4) Foundation capacity is determined by comparing analysis reactions to original design reactions. Design loads were <br />multiplied by 1.35 for comparison as allowed by TIA-222-H, Section 15.6.2. <br />5) Although the axial and shear capacity are at 46.3% and 41.1%, respectively, the moment reaction in the governing criteria <br />for a monopole drilled shaft foundation. Therefore, the overall capacity for this foundation is 33.3%. <br /> <br />4.1) Recommendations <br /> <br />1) If the load differs from that described in Table 1 of this report or the provisions of this analysis are <br />found to be invalid, another structural analysis should be performed. <br />2) The tower and its foundation have sufficient capacity to carry the proposed load configuration. <br />No modifications are required at this time. <br />3) TEP did not have sufficient information to perform a foundation analysis. If a foundation analysis <br />is required, please provide TEP with a geotechnical report for this site to determine the <br />substructure capacity. If this information is not available, TEP recommends a geotechnical <br />investigation. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.