My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MGT OF AMERICA, INC. (2) - 2018
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
M
>
MGT OF AMERICA, INC. (2) - 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2019 12:23:17 PM
Creation date
5/22/2018 2:48:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
MGT OF AMERICA, INC.
Contract #
A-2018-112
Agency
PUBLIC WORKS
Council Approval Date
5/1/2018
Expiration Date
4/30/2021
Insurance Exp Date
7/1/2020
Destruction Year
2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UNDERSTANDING OF NEED <br />project. All the necessary project files, formats, calculation and methodologies have already been created <br />and tested over the past five years. These formats are ready for the 2016/17 fiscal year data to be entered <br />and calculations made. MGT uses the same format that is suggested in the federal and state circulars and <br />that are used in all our state and federal related work. <br />Our project team gained valuable Insight and experience preparing and submitting the 2014/2015 project <br />to Caltrans. The resulting desk audit and the work performed guiding the City through that submission <br />will prove extremely important as the next series of submissions are prepared. It is one thing to read about <br />cognizant agencies submission requirements — It is far better to have participated In such a submission. <br />One benefit of working through one year of submission is that MGT has been working with the City In <br />setting goals for data accuracy Improvement, time keeping system requirements, staff training, and for <br />Improving communication strategies for state approval authorities and with the customer— OCTA. <br />Because of our current experience with Santa Ana Public Works, MGT has matched in-house formats, <br />tested excel methodologies, proven strategies, and tried and true processes with knowledge gained over <br />30 years of negotiations with federal and state authorities, Bringing these pieces of the project puzzle <br />together is a great advantage MGT as we approach this endeavor. <br />PROJECT APPROACH <br />Cost allocation plans and ICRPs are essential tools for municipal fiscal management. Typically, our clients <br />desire to establish and maintain a well -documented and defensible plan that can be used to recover <br />Indirect administrative costs in a variety of internal and external contexts. MGT is a nationally recognized <br />specialist in developing cost allocation plans and assisting our clients with cost allocation plan <br />Implementation. Our analysis will allow the City to account for the actual cost of providing numerous <br />services within city operations and to calculate hourly staff rates that will recover all allocated costs using <br />a clear, equitable and legally defensible method. <br />MGrs cost allocation plans provide our clients with exceptional financial and managerial information. <br />Examples of useful and meaningful information that can be extracted from the project results include: <br />• Compliant documentation for state or federal reimbursement <br />• Defensible interfund transfers <br />• Establishing user fees and hourly billing rates <br />• Identification of administrative expense <br />The chart below Illustrates each of the four major steps of the project: <br />1. Allocation of citywide costs to all departments in the city using a citywide CAP <br />2. Allocation of PW administrative costs (10117601) to PW functions using a departmental CAP <br />3. Development of an indirect cost rate for fund 86 operations using a ICRP <br />4. Calculation of full cost hourly rates for staff members in fund 86 design and construction <br />�•��� M/'_T CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA I MARCH 8, 201.8 <br />CONSULTING GROUP RFP NO 18-0231 1 PROPOSAL FOR COST ALLOCATION PLAN / ISF ALLOCATION STUDY : PAGE 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.