My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MGT OF AMERICA, INC. (2) - 2018
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
M
>
MGT OF AMERICA, INC. (2) - 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2019 12:23:17 PM
Creation date
5/22/2018 2:48:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
MGT OF AMERICA, INC.
Contract #
A-2018-112
Agency
PUBLIC WORKS
Council Approval Date
5/1/2018
Expiration Date
4/30/2021
Insurance Exp Date
7/1/2020
Destruction Year
2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UNDERSTANDING OF NEED <br />.. <br />FULL COST CALCULATION METHODOLOGY <br />COST PLANS - COMPARING THE TWO TYPES OF PLANS <br />FULL COST VS, FEDERAL COST ALLOCATION PLANS: Cost allocation plans are a series of complex <br />calculations that require an understanding ajurisdictlon's financial reports, administration structure, and <br />operational services and programs. These calculations are typically presented In two types of plans — a <br />Full Cost plan or a plan that conforms with 2 CFR Part 200 (Formerly OMB Circular A•87) Uniform <br />Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. It is possible <br />to use the latter for all costing purposes, but in certain cases, an agency would not maximize its revenue <br />recovery by using this plan. To fully calculate the full cost of city services, a City may consider a Full Cost <br />Allocation plan. However, if the calculations from the CAP are to be used for federal of state <br />reimbursement, the 2 CFR 200 CAP is the document typically required. In this section, we will provide a <br />discussion of both types of plans. <br />Local agencies provide services that include administrative and support expenditures which are not <br />allowable for federal reimbursement. These expenditures, however, are appropriate for allocation under <br />GAAP principles and guidelines. This allocation methodology Is often referred to as a Full Cost allocation <br />plan. It can be generalized that a Full Cost allocation plan is applicable for internal purposes such as <br />recovering Indirect costs from enterprise funds, special revenue funds and otherfunds, as well as included <br />In establishing user fees, permits and applications, billing rates, hourly rates and costs of special services. <br />Using federal guidelines, which are now codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 200, local <br />governments may be reimbursed for administrative and support expenditures if they are documented in <br />M G T CfFY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA I MARCI18, 2018 <br />CONSULTING cROOP RFP NO 18-0231 1 PROPOSAL FOR COST ALLOCATION PLAN / ISF- ALLOCATION STUDY : PAGE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.