Laserfiche WebLink
11. Circumstances arise under which failure to revoke the permit and <br />remove the facility would result in hazardous or dangerous <br />conditions, or otherwise compromise the safety of the PROW. <br />(e) Notice of Action. A written determination of revocation shall be mailed to <br />the applicant within ten (10) days of such determination. <br />(f) An applicant whose permit has been revoked may have the revocation <br />reviewed, upon written appeal as follows: <br />1. Within fourteen (14) days of the revocation, a written appeal shall <br />be filed with the Director. The appeal must contain a statement <br />listing the reasons why the applicant believes that the revocation <br />should be reviewed. The Director shall render a decision within <br />twenty-one (21) days of receipt of the statement described herein. <br />2. If the Director denies the appeal, the permiftee may file a written <br />notice of appeal with the City Council within twenty-one (21) days <br />of notification of the Director's denial. The appeal to the City <br />Council must contain a statement of any significant factors and/or <br />hardships as well as alternatives explored, and a response to the <br />findings of the Director that resulted in the denial. The appeal <br />shall be conducted in accordance with Chapter 3 of this Code. <br />Sec. 33-244. - Site Selection Guidelines and Criteria. <br />(a) The Director may authorize new poles within the public rights-of-way, <br />or wireless facilities in underground utility areas, only with a finding <br />that such new pole or wireless facility, as applicable, is necessary to <br />avoid prohibiting or having the effect of prohibiting the provision of <br />personal wireless services pursuant to the United States <br />Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II)). <br />(b) Traffic Obstruction. The placement of the facility shall not <br />permanently impede vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor shall such <br />installation Violate siting regufatioris imposed -by the Califorhia Public <br />Utilities Commission. <br />(c) No modification to above -ground or at -grade facilities, including those <br />related to size, color and shape of the housing, may be made by the <br />applicant without first having obtained approval of the Director. <br />Sec. 33-245. - Visual Impact Guidelines. <br />(a) Unobtrusive Design. Wireless facilities shall be designed to be as <br />visually unobtrusive as feasible. Colors and designs must be visually <br />neutral, integrated and compatible with surrounding buildings and/or <br />uses in the area. Facilities shall be sited to avoid or minimize <br />obstruction of views from adjacent properties and otherwise preserve <br />the aesthetic integrity of the public right-of-way. <br />Ordinance No. NS -XXX <br />Page 14 of 21 <br />50A-18 <br />