My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-075 - Final Subsequent Environmental IMpact Report No. 2018-15
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2018
>
2018-075 - Final Subsequent Environmental IMpact Report No. 2018-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2019 9:29:20 AM
Creation date
9/20/2018 5:10:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2018-075
Date
9/18/2018
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana <br />Impact Statement Impact Summary Findings <br />2. CEQH Findings <br />Transportation/Traffic <br />Impact 4.8-1: Implementation of <br />In the buildout year (2040), the <br />Findingsl, 2, and 3. No additional feasible mitigation is available and some <br />the proposed project would cause <br />level of service (LOS) would <br />improvements are outside the City's jurisdiction. <br />an increase in traffic that is <br />remain acceptable for 37 of the <br />substantial in relation to existing <br />52 intersections. While <br />With implementation of mitigation measures MM -OZ 4.12-1 through MM - <br />traffic load and capacity of the <br />implementation of all of the . <br />OZ 4.12-4, all the affected study intersections would operate at acceptable <br />street system. <br />recommended improvements <br />LOS values after recommended improvements are implemented. In addition <br />identified in the SEIR would <br />to the recommended improvements, signal timing optimization is <br />result in acceptable LOS, some of <br />recommended for all traffic signals in the study area. While implementation <br />the significantly affected <br />of all of the recommended improvements would result in acceptable LOS, <br />intersections would be outside of <br />some of the significantly affected intersections would be outside of the <br />the City's jurisdiction. Therefore, <br />City's jurisdiction. Therefore, the City cannot ensure implementation of the <br />the City cannot ensure <br />suggested improvements and impacts are considered to be significant and <br />implementation of the suggested <br />unavoidable. <br />improvements, and impacts are <br />considered to be significant and <br />unavoidable. <br />Impact 4.8-2: Implementation of <br />the proposed project would <br />exceed standards established by <br />the Orange County <br />Transportation Authority (OCTA) <br />within the Study Area. <br />The proposed project has been <br />found to exceed standards <br />established by OCTA for three <br />Congestion Management Program <br />(CMP) intersections. All the <br />affected study intersections <br />would operate at acceptable LOS <br />values after recommended <br />improvements are implemented. <br />While implementation of all of <br />the recommended improvements <br />detailed in the SEIR would result <br />in acceptable LOS, certain CMP <br />intersections would be outside of <br />the City's jurisdiction and are the <br />responsibility, of the California <br />Department of Transportation <br />(Caltrans). Therefore, the City <br />cannot ensure implementation of <br />Findings 1 and 2. Changes or alterations have been required in, or <br />incorporated into the project which avoid, substantially lessen, or reduce <br />the magnitude of the significant environmental effect; however, <br />implementation of the recommended improvements are outside of the <br />City's jurisdiction. <br />Implementation of the improvement measures detailed in mitigation <br />measures MM -OZ 4.12-2 through MM -OZ 4.12-4 from the MEMU EIR and <br />newly developed mitigation measure MM -TRA -1 for these three <br />intersections would improve the level of service to acceptable operating <br />conditions. Therefore, if the improvement measures are implemented in the <br />future under specific development projects, impacts on these intersections <br />would be less than significant. However, while implementation of all of the <br />recommended improvements would result in acceptable LOS, these CMP <br />intersections would be outside of the City's jurisdiction and are the <br />responsibility of Caltrans. Therefore, the City cannot ensure implementation <br />of the suggested improvements, and impacts are considered to be <br />significant and unavoidable. <br />Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay District Expansion and Elan August 2018 <br />Development Projects 2-11 ICF 19.18 <br />Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.