Laserfiche WebLink
I KMEA <br />The results of these analyses along with other geologic and hydrogeologic assessments were subsequently used to support the <br />determination of suitability of these materials for reuse as Tier I soil under the RWQCB's Conditional Waiver No. 10. Upwards of <br />$1.2M of cost savings were realized by the GSA through this process. <br />Title — SSA Pasadena TI ACM and Lead Survey <br />Location — Federal Building,104 North Mentor Avenue, Pasadena, CA <br />Date Completed - 3/07117 <br />Client — General Services Administration (GSA, AMD, FIELD SUPPORT SECTION (9PQ2FS)) <br />Total Value - $4,034.56 <br />Client Reference — Albert Kachigyan, (213) 703-3921, alberLkachigyan@gsa.gov <br />Project Description - KMEA performed asbestos and lead surveys in the Social Security Administration building in Pasadena, <br />California. The purpose was to assess the condition of asbestos -containing (ACM), report the condition of the ACM and lead based <br />paint (LBP) containing materials on the area specified (approximately 8,250 SgFt) and to make remediation recommendations to the <br />General Services Administration. <br />KMEA's detailed understanding of the various regulations impacting a federal building located within the boundaries of the state of <br />California as well as local regulations from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Los Angeles County Department <br />of Public Health ensured a smooth and professional process designed to swiftly and professionally complete the project without <br />disturbing the other tenants in the building. <br />KMEA thoroughly documented all fieldwork activities with field notes and digital photography. The asbestos surveys included <br />sampling and analysis, as well as visual determination for materials where assumption that the material was asbestos was more <br />practical than sampling and confirming through laboratory analysis. The inventory field work and subsequent reporting followed <br />AHERA procedures and compliance as well as ASTM E2356 Standard Practice for Comprehensive Building Asbestos Surveys. <br />The asbestos survey followed the standards set forth in the United States Environmental protection Agency's Asbestos National <br />Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs; 40 CFR 61, Subpart M) and the South Coast Air Quality Management <br />District (SCAQMD), the local air pollution control district, as well as the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration <br />(OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 and 29 CFR 1910.1001) and the California Department of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA). <br />The asbestos approach included use of polarized light microscopy (PLM), with limited confirmation by point count or transmission <br />electron microscopy (TEM) when PLM was not sufficient to demonstrate compliance. Primary sampling utilized FILM method EPA <br />600/R-93-116 conducted by a testing laboratory accredited with the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) <br />administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). <br />Each sample location was assigned a unique sample identification number, and its location identified in building drawings, which <br />were included in the final survey report. The reports included chain of custody forms, NVLAP laboratory reports, AHERA credentials <br />and signatures of asbestos inspectors, as well as general observations made by the inspection team and specific recommendations <br />for all asbestos containing materials identified, including rough order magnitude cost estimates for abatement of all positively <br />identified asbestos containing materials. <br />Concurrent with the asbestos survey, KMEA performed a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) limited Lead - <br />Based Paint (LBP) Inspection of the same property, utilizing a hand-held X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer and state-of-the-art <br />practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards. This inspection was performed in accordance with 24 CFR Part <br />35.80-35.98 and 35.3120(b) — U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) <br />Section 406, 40 CFR 745.103 — Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Title 17 Section 35000 — Code of California Regulations, <br />Cal/OSHA Title 8 Section 1532.1 — California Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Cal/OSHA Title 8 Section 5194 — <br />California Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Title 17, CCR, Division 1, Chapter 8 and 24 CFR Subtitle A, Part 35.125. <br />Additionally, the more stringent standards established by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health required the use of <br />a more conservative "abatement" level" (threshold) setting of 0.7 mg/cm2. <br />Title _ Phase I ESA (Historical Site Characterization) and Phase II ESA at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station <br />Location —Old Pacific Highway, Pendleton, CA 92058 <br />City of Santa Ana Page 14 June 5, 2018 <br />Various Environmental Services <br />RFP NO.: 18-043 <br />