Laserfiche WebLink
POP — 8/30/14 - 8/31115 <br />Client— Southern California Edison <br />Total Value - $1.2.M <br />Client Reference — Steven Vaughan, (949) 368.788, stevie.vaughan@sce.com <br />Project Description — Project included scoping, costing and execution of environmental site characterization studies in support of <br />the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station decommissioning. San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station is about 220 acres consisting <br />of 89 structures/building with an average age of 38 years old comprising 940,000 square feet. Work scope was broken into two <br />phases: Phase I ESA or Historical Site Assessment (HSA) and follow-on Phase II ESA including a full-blown Site Characterization <br />of the nature and extent of non -radiological chemical constituents of potential concern (COPCs) associated with historical site <br />operations and incidental chemical spills. Evaluations were conducted through laboratory analysis of representative samples <br />collected from surface, near -surface and subsurface soil and groundwater. The scope also included characterization of systems, <br />components and structures for lead -based paint (LBP), lead -containing materials (LCM), PCBs, mercury and for asbestos. Surveys <br />of suspect _BP and LCM were conducted in general accordance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development <br />(HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing adopted for industrial and commercial <br />applications. This was initially accomplished using a hand-held X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyzer as a rapid field <br />screening tool to measure the lead concentrations. Bulk paint chip samples were subsequently collected and analyzed by a fixed - <br />base laboratory to confirm the XRF initial screening results. Bulk samples for lead and asbestos evaluations were sent to AmeriSci, <br />an EPA accredited and State -certified laboratory for analysis. A total of 1,272 samples were collected for asbestos analysis. A total <br />of 3,791 XRF measurements were made for lead evaluations which were supplemented with 260 paint chip samples for confirmation <br />by laboratory analysis. The ultimate objective of the site characterization was to provide an estimate of the class of waste and <br />volume of impacted materials ultimately targeted for demolition and removal during facility decommissioning. The non -radiological <br />team's efforts were synchronized and were carried out seamlessly with the radiological team with common project objectives and <br />goals. The project deliverables included the HSA and Site Characterization report including Objective Evidence Binders with all <br />supporting documentation for SCE/NRC review and approval. <br />Title — Contaminated Soil Removal and Site Characterization <br />Location — Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center Bridgeport, CA <br />POP — 6/29/17 — 6/29118 <br />Client— Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest (NAVFAC SW) <br />Total Value - $386,670 <br />Client Reference — Bipin Patel (619) 532-4814, bipinkumar.patel@navy.mil <br />Project Description — Marine Corps Mountain Training Center (MCMWTC) Bridgeport is operated by the Department of the Navy <br />(DON) on land managed by the US Forest Service (USFS) through an interagency memorandum of understanding (MOU). The <br />facility is located on the northern flank of Pickle Meadow, California on the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevada, within the Bridgeport <br />District of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest. During construction and upgrading the helicopter refueling facility (Hot Fuel Point), <br />petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was found in subsurface soil under the Hot Pit at MCMWTC Bridgeport. The goal of this <br />project was to characterize and remove contaminated soil and conduct additional site characterization to confirm that the <br />contaminated soil has successfully been removed. The Regional Water Quality Control Board (Lahontan Region) is the overseeing <br />regulatory agencyforthis project. Following review of the KMEA's site characterization reports, the RWQCB concurred with KMEA's <br />recommendations for case closure. KMEA produced complete and accurate reports of its site characterization work following <br />th�roved planning documents and protocols. As such, the RWQCB was able to provide its consensus and concurrence <br />with KMEA's "no further action" recommendation with minimum to no comments to be addressed following its review of <br />the deliverables. The KMEA deliverables included tabulated summaries of analytical laboratory data from soil sampling conducted, <br />illustrative site drawings showing investigation locations, analysis of data and screening of risks posed to human health and the <br />environment along with a refinement of the site conceptual model based on the new data acquired for the project site. KMEA <br />provided the following services towards the fulfilment of the project objectives: <br />• Prepared the project planning documents including the Work Plan, Sampling Analysis Plan, Site Safety and Accident <br />Prevention Plan and received approval from the Navy and the RWQCB to proceed <br />City of Santa Ana Page 15 June 5, 2018 <br />Various Environmental Services <br />RFP NO.: 18-043 <br />