Laserfiche WebLink
Memorandum: 2525 Main <br />Parking Analysis <br />General Plan Circulation Element. The City's General Plan acknowledges that while adequate supply of parking is essential to the <br />economic success of businesses, parking needs should be evaluated to determine needed changes based upon changing circumstances <br />in land use patterns and the public's mode of travel. Policy 7.4 of the General Plan Circulation Element also states that parking <br />requirements be re-evaluated and updated on a regular basis. It should be noted that the City's parking ratios are from 1997 and are <br />over 20 years old. With changes in demographics, increased transit, and increased uses of active transportation modes in the City, an <br />update to the parking standards is needed. <br />Parking Study & Rate Calculation. Translutions surveyed two similar facilities in the area to identify parking generation factors for <br />similar multi -family residential projects. The two facilities surveyed are Nineteen01 and The Marke. Both properties are similar to the <br />proposed project in terms of rents, target population, apartment types, and amenities. <br />NineteenOl is located at 1901 East First Street in the City of Santa Ana and has 254 units. The unit breakdown for NoneteenOl is as <br />follows: <br />• 1 Bedroom -123 units (48.4%) <br />2 Bedroom -125 units (49.2%) <br />• 3 Bedroom - 6 units (2.4%) <br />The Marke is located at 100 E MacArthur Boulevard in the City of Santa Ana and has 300 units. The unit breakdown for Noneteen01 is <br />as follows: <br />1 Bedroom -155 units (51.7%) <br />• 2 Bedroom -131 units (43.6%) <br />• 3 Bedroom -14 units (4.7%) <br />To identify parking demand for the two projects, Translutions contracted with Counts Unlimited, Inc. to conduct a parking occupancy <br />survey for the two facilities identified above. The surveys were conducted on one weekday (Thursday) and one weekend day (Saturday) <br />in April 2018 for a period of 24 hours. Table B shows the findings of this analysis. Detailed parking accumulation data is included in <br />Attachment A. <br />Table B: Parking Survey Summary <br />Survey Location <br />Units <br />Day of Week <br />Parking <br />Parking <br />NineteenOl <br />254 <br />Peak Weekday <br />344 <br />1.354 <br />Peak Weekend <br />342 <br />1.346 <br />The Marke <br />300 <br />Peak Weekday <br />230 <br />0.767 <br />Peak Weekend <br />193 <br />0.643 <br />Average Demand (Weekday) <br />1.060 <br />Average Demand (Weekend) <br />0.995 <br />Peak Parking Demand Per Unit (Weekday & Weekend) <br />1.354 <br />Project Maximum Parking Demand (496 Units) <br />1 496 1 <br />1 <br />672 <br />As seen on Table B, the peak weekday parking demand is 1.354 spaces per unit observed at Nineteen01. The peak weekend parking <br />demand is 1.346 spaces per unit observed at Nineteen01. Therefore, the peak parking demand based on empirical data occurred at <br />Nineteen0l, at the rate of 1.354 parking spaces per unit. <br />Parking Needs for Proposed Project. Applying the peak parking rate based on empirical data, the peak parking demand for the <br />proposed project is anticipated to be 672 spaces. The project will include 904 parking spaces, which is approximately 35% more than the <br />number of spaces forecast based on empirical data. <br />Conclusion. The parking supply required for the project using parking rates from the SAMC is 1,420 spaces, which translates to more <br />than 2.86 parking spaces per residential unit. Since the parking requirements in the SAMC are over 20 years old, Translutions conducted <br />surveys at two similar facilities currently in operation. The peak parking demand was observed to be 1.354 spaces per unit. Using the <br />MAIN STR ARKING ANALYSISWARKING R SEOWARKING MEMO.000K <br />2 <br />75E-297 <br />