My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 4:04:49 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 3:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br />response times that could cumulatively combine with other development projects in the City, and impacts <br />related to emergency response times from Fire Stations 70 and 71 would be less than cumulatively <br />considerable. <br />Because 4 of the City's 10 existing fire stations exist within 2.5 miles of the Project site, and related <br />projects would be subject to the same impact fees that provide funding for additional equipment and <br />staffing, and fire safe construction requirements, impacts related to fire services from the proposed Project <br />would not combine with other related projects to result in a cumulative impact related to the need for new <br />or physically altered fire service facilities. <br />For these reasons detailed in the DEM, the Project's cumulative effects relating to fire protection services <br />would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and fixture probable projects. <br />(DEIR, pp. 4.10-5.) <br />Police Services <br />The Project would result in an incremental increase in demands on law enforcement services and based <br />on the Police Department's 2016 staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the proposed Project <br />would require one additional officer for the Department's Northeast District that serves all areas of the <br />City north of First Street and East of Flower Street. <br />In addition, the DEIR estimates that the cumulative projects would require an additional 3 officers to <br />maintain the City's existing officers to population ratio. The addition of less than 1 officer from the <br />proposed Project and 2 officers from the other projects within the Police Department's Northeast District <br />would not require the need for, new or physically altered police protection facilities. <br />For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to police services would <br />not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. (DEIR, <br />pp. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) <br />Parks and Recreation <br />The proposed Project would provide onsite recreational facilities for residents that would meet many <br />recreation and park needs of Project residents. In addition, the Project would be required to pay park fees <br />to offset usage of existing park and recreation facilities. The cumulative projects within the City of Santa <br />Ana would also be required to provide park and recreational facilities and/or pay in -lieu fees as required <br />by each city, which are implemented to preserve an appropriate balance between the demand by residents <br />for use of park and recreational facilities, and as a result reduce cumulative effects of each project. Thus, <br />because the proposed Project would provide the open space and recreation facilities and would provide <br />payment of the required park fees, the Project's impact would not be cumulatively considerable, and <br />cumulative impacts related to park and recreation facilities would be less than significant. <br />For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to parks and recreation <br />would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable projects. <br />(DEIR, pp. 4.10-14.) <br />Resolution No. _ <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-94 <br />Page 56 of 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.