My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 4:04:49 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 3:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBITA <br />OCSD reclamation facilities have an average flow of 184 mgd and a treatment capacity of 462 mgd <br />(OCSD, 2017). Due to this volume of excess capacity that is designed by OCSD to accommodate future <br />regional growth, the increase in wastewater flow from the proposed Project that would require 0.04 percent <br />of this remaining capacity would not significantly impact the OCSD reclamation facilities. As a result, <br />impacts related to cumulative projects wastewater treatment and conveyance capacity would be less than <br />significant. <br />For these reasons detailed in the DEIR, the Project's cumulative effects relating to wastewater treatment <br />and conveyance would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future <br />probable projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-12.) <br />Drainage and Water Quality <br />All projects in the watershed are required to implement measures to comply with the LID, MS4 Permit, <br />DAMP requirements for implementation of SWPPPs and WQMPs. These requirements were developed <br />to reduce the cumulative impacts to water quality, and to ensure that the incremental effects of individual <br />projects do not cause a substantial cumulative impact related to water quality. <br />Implementation of the proposed Project would include compliance with all required laws, permits, and <br />plans, through implementation of a SWPPP and WQMP that would be approved by the City prior to <br />construction and operational permits and have been designed to reduce impacts associated with drainage <br />and water quality. The proposed Project would result in a decrease in impervious surfaces due to the <br />increase in landscape and open space areas. Additionally, the DAMP required runoff volume would be <br />filtered through the detention and drywell systems prior to discharge off-site to manage stormwater <br />drainage and protect water quality. The detention and drywell treatment systems have high removal <br />effectiveness for all storm water pollutants of concern. Thus, the runoff volume that would result from the <br />proposed Project would not increase, and the proposed treatment systems would remove pollutants from <br />onsite runoff. Therefore, the proposed Project would not generate volumes of stormwater flows or polluted <br />runoff that could combine with other projects to be cumulatively considerable. As a result, cumulative <br />impacts from implementation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. <br />For the reasons discussed in the DEM, the Project's cumulative effects relating to drainage and water <br />quality would not be cumulatively considerable when considered with past, current, and future probable <br />projects. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-19.) <br />10.0 FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL <br />CHANGES AND ENERGY USE <br />The CEQA Guidelines require that EIRs reveal the significant environmental changes that would occur as <br />a result of a proposed Project. CEQA also requires decision makers to balance the benefits of a project <br />against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve a project. This section <br />addresses non-renewable resources, the commitment of future generations to the proposed uses, and <br />irreversible impacts associated with the Project. <br />The Project would result in or contribute to the following irreversible environmental changes: <br />Resolution No. <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-96 <br />Page 58 of 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.