My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
75E - PH 2525 MAIN ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 4:04:49 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 3:58:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75E
Date
2/5/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
47I <br />• Lands in the Project area that are currently developed with office uses would be committed to <br />multi -family residential uses once the proposed buildings are constructed. Secondary effects <br />associated with this irreversible commitment of land resources include: <br />o Changes in views associated with construction of the new buildings and associated <br />development (see Section 4.1 of the DEIR, Aesthetics). <br />o Increased traffic on area roadways (see Section 4.11 of the DEIR, Transportation and <br />Traffic). <br />o Emissions of air pollutants associated with Project construction and operation (see Section <br />4.2 of the DEIR, Air Quality). <br />o Consumption of non-renewable energy associated with construction and operation of the <br />proposed Project due to the use of automobiles, lighting, heating and cooling systems, <br />appliances, and the like (see Section 4.14 of the DEIR, Energy). <br />o Increased ambient noise associated with an increase in activities and traffic from operation of <br />the Project (see Section 4.8, Noise). <br />• Construction of the Project as described in Section 3.0 of the DEIR, Project Description, would <br />require the use of energy produced from non-renewable resources and construction materials. <br />In regard to energy usage from the proposed Project, the Project would not involve wasteful or <br />unjustifiable use of non-renewable resources, and conservation efforts would be enforced during <br />construction and operation of proposed development. The proposed development would incorporate <br />energy -generating and conserving project design features, including those required by the California <br />Building Code, California Energy Code Title 24, which specify green building standards for new <br />developments. In addition, the Project includes project design features that result in additional energy - <br />efficiency. (DEIR, p. 5-4.) <br />11.0 GROWTH INDUCING EFFECTS <br />Section 15126(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a discussion of a proposed project's potential to foster <br />economic or population growth, including ways in which a project could remove an obstacle to growth. <br />Growth does not necessarily create significant physical changes to the environment. However, depending <br />upon the type, magnitude, and location of growth, it can result in significant adverse environmental effects <br />if it requires new development or infrastructure to support it. The Project's growth effects would be <br />considered significant if they could result in significant physical effects in one or more environmental <br />issue areas. As discussed in Section 5.0, Mandatory Findings of Significance, of the DEIR, the limited <br />number of jobs generated by the Project would represent a small portion of the estimated job growth that <br />would be within, and not exceed, SCAG's population forecast. As such, the Project would result in direct <br />employment growth at a level that is already anticipated in regional projections; and thus, would be less <br />than significant. <br />The Project would not remove obstacles to growth, e.g., through the construction or extension of major <br />infrastructure facilities that do not presently exist in the Project area, or by expansion of public services <br />in the Project area. The infrastructure needed to serve the Project would be sized to specifically serve the <br />site and excess capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth; and the Project <br />would not create a demand for public services beyond what is already contemplated. <br />Additionally, as described in Section 5.0, Mandatory Findings of Significance, of the DEIR, SCAG <br />Resolution No. <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-97 <br />Page 59 of 71 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.