Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Clerk of the Council <br />City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, California 92701 <br />January 28, 2019 <br />Re: Density Bonus Agreement No. 2018-01 <br />Dear Mayor Pulido and City Council Members: <br />I am writing to you in support of Density Bonus Agreement No. 2018-01 for the construction of the <br />Legacy Square project at 609 N. Spurgeon St.. <br />My husband and I have owned a home in Santa Ana since 1976. We are long-time members of Santa <br />Ana United Methodist Church, which owns the property in question. The church has partnered with <br />National Community Renaissance (CORE) and Mercy House to create affordable housing for the <br />people of Santa Ana. I am excited that our church can be a part of the effort to meet the challenge of <br />housing for homeless and low-income members of our community. <br />I attended the Planning Commission meeting on January 14 at which the Density Bonus Agreement <br />was presented and ultimately approved. I was caught off -guard by some of the objections that were <br />raised by community members, and in anticipation that those concerns may come up again at the <br />City Council meeting on February 5,1 would like to address them. <br />Several people commented that "they're taking away our church." They elaborated on their church's <br />ministries in the community. Those expressing these views are members of one of the churches that <br />currently rents space from Santa Ana United Methodist Church. It is understandable that they feel <br />distress at being displaced from the buildings that have been their "home" for a number of years; <br />however, SAUMC has every right to determine how we use our property. We believe that providing <br />a safe and secure home for individuals and families is an appropriate ministry for our church. By <br />entering into a ground lease arrangement with CORE, we can serve those in need and also derive <br />some limited financial benefit for other ongoing ministries of SAUMC. On the practical side, if we <br />had decided to sell, it is highly unlikely that the renters would have had the means to purchase the <br />property, valued at nearly $5 million in as -is condition, or to restore the red -tagged building, which <br />we've been told will cost at least $3 million to make useable again. In addition, as part of the <br />redevelopment, both our current renters have been offered options and assistance to relocate. I <br />wish that they could be reassured that a church is not made up of buildings, but of people, and that <br />wherever they resettle, God is in control of the situation, and if they desire to serve Him, He will <br />bless them and their efforts. <br />A second group of people who raised objections were from the nearby French Park neighborhood. <br />Some felt they had not been properly notified of the plan, but we have confirmed that in fact all the <br />requirements of notifying them were met, including an opportunity to come to a sunshine meeting. <br />