My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - PH - 2525 N. MAIN ST._ADJOURNED
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/19/2019
>
75E - PH - 2525 N. MAIN ST._ADJOURNED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:12:32 PM
Creation date
2/14/2019 2:23:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75E
Date
2/19/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, <br />AA No. 2018-10 2525 North Main Street <br />February 5, 2019 <br />Page 6 <br />This project is required to comply with the City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO). To satisfy <br />the provisions of the HOO, applicant is proposing to pay an in -lieu fee in excess of $6,000,000. <br />See Table 4 below for a breakdown of the proposed HOO fee. <br />Table 4: Housing Opportunity Fee Summary <br />Habitable Square Footage <br />Incluslonary ljoysirtg Fee <br />I Estimated, Fee <br />404,746 <br />$15 persquare foot <br />$6,071,190 <br />*As measured from the exterior walls of the residential units. This calculation does not include exterior hallways, <br />common areas, landscape, open space or exterior stairways* <br />Analysis of the Issues <br />Environmental Impact Report <br />The applicant submitted a development proposal that requires the approval of several discretionary <br />applications. Given the size and location of the project, as well as the proposed zoning and general <br />plan modifications, extensive environmental review was needed. After completion of the Initial Study <br />for the project, it was determined that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) required the <br />preparation and certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) for this project. The purpose of <br />an EIR is to identify the significant effects on the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to <br />the project, and to indicate the manner in which those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. <br />To determine what potential effects would be caused by the project, the EIR analyzed issues related <br />to Aesthetics; Air Quality; Biological Resources; Cultural/Historic Resources; Greenhouse Gas <br />Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Land Use and Planning; Noise; Population and <br />Housing; Public Services; Transportation and Circulation; Tribal Cultural Resources; Utilities and <br />Service Systems; and Energy. <br />On February 12, 2018, the Initial Study and Notice of Preparation were released to solicit comments <br />regarding the scope and content of the Draft EIR (DEIR). A scoping meeting was held on March 1, <br />2018 with approximately 164 people in attendance and a total of 163 written comment letters were <br />received at the conclusion of the 30 -day public comment period. The comments were reviewed, and <br />additional areas of analysis and studies were added to the scope of the Draft EIR as appropriate. <br />The comments are included as Appendix A of the Draft EIR. <br />The Draft EIR analyzed the direct and indirect impacts resulting from construction and operation of <br />the proposed project. In addition to analyzing fourteen environmental topic areas, the EIR also <br />evaluated three options for access and egress to the project. The analysis included Main Street <br />access only as proposed (Option A), access from Main Street plus a secondary access/egress <br />driveway at the Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park intersection (Option B), and <br />access/egress from both Main Street and Edgewood Road (Option C). <br />Three project alternatives were also analyzed within the document. These included a no build <br />alternative, where the existing approximately 80,000 square foot building would remain as is and <br />be reoccupied by an office use (Alternative 1); a reduced multi -family project consisting of a 30 <br />percent reduction in density (Alternative 2); and build out of the site under the existing Professional <br />75E-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.