Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, pp. 36-37.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: Neither the Project site nor any adjacent properties are included on the list <br />of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5. (DEIR, p. 2-6; <br />Initial Study, pp. 36-37.) For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial <br />Study, impacts associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. <br />9.8.4 Public Airports <br />Threshold: For a Project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been <br />adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety <br />hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 <br />miles of an airport. The closest airport to the Project site is John Wayne Airport, which is located over 6 <br />miles to the south of the Project site. In addition, the Fullerton Municipal Airport is located approximately <br />9.35 miles to the northwest of the Project site. Therefore, the Project would not result in a safety hazard <br />for people residing or working in the Project area. (Initial Study, p. 37.) <br />9.8.5 Private Airstrips <br />Threshold: For a Project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project result in a <br />safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and <br />would not result in safety hazards related to an airstrip. (Initial Study, p. 37.) For the reasons discussed <br />above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts associated with this issue would <br />be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. <br />9.8.6 Emergency Response Plans <br />Threshold: Would the Project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted <br />emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 37.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not physically interfere with an adopted emergency <br />response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Direct access to the Project site is, and will continue to be, <br />provided from N. Main Street (to the south) and Edgewood Road (to the east), which are adjacent to the <br />Project site. hi addition, fire lanes are proposed for the northern and western boundaries of the Project site. <br />Construction activities would occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency <br />vehicles to the Project site or adjacent areas. In addition, travel along surrounding roadways would remain <br />open and would not interfere with emergency access in the site vicinity. Moreover, the Project must <br />comply with Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9) <br />and the City of Santa Ana Fire Code included as Municipal Code Chapter 14. As such, for the reasons <br />discussed herein and in the Initial Study, the Project would not impair implementation of or physically <br />Resolution No. _ <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-70 <br />Page 32 of 71 <br />