Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and impacts would be <br />less than significant. (Initial Study, p. 37.) <br />9.8.7 Wildland Fires <br />Threshold: Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or <br />death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where <br />residences are intermixed with wildlands? <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 38.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is located within an urban developed area and is not located <br />within an identified wildland fire hazard area and is not an area where residences are intermixed with <br />wildlands. <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIF, p. 2-6; <br />Initial Study, p. 38.) <br />9.9 Hydrology and Water Quality <br />9.9.1 Water Quality Standards <br />Threshold: Would the Project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge <br />requirements? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-6; Initial Study, p. 40.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: Section 18-156 of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code states that all new <br />development and significant redevelopment within the City shall be undertaken in accordance with the <br />County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). Accordingly, both construction and operational Best <br />Management Practices (BMPs) would be required to be implemented as part of permitting of the Project. <br />Adherence to a City -approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and a Water Quality <br />Management Plan (WQMP) that includes Low Impact Development (LID) features, which would be <br />verified prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit, would ensure that potential water quality <br />degradation associated with construction and operational activities would be minimized to a level of less <br />than significance. <br />For the foregoing reasons and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the Initial Study, impacts associated <br />with this issue would less than significant, and no mitigation is required. <br />(Initial Study, pp. 40-41.) <br />9.9.2 Groundwater Supplies <br />Threshold: Would the Project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially <br />with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the <br />local groundwater table level? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 41.) <br />Resolution No. <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-71 <br />Page 33 of 71 <br />