My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (GENERAL COMMENTS)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
02/05/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75E (GENERAL COMMENTS)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2019 12:38:42 PM
Creation date
2/19/2019 11:32:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75E
Date
2/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of $23. 5million, or $940K per year. This also assumes a vacant lot for the next 25 years. Numbers are <br />based on 517 units. <br />10. According to the EIR, fifteen freeway segments analyzed have a failing Level of Service (LOS) in 25 of the <br />30 data points measured. The EIR says traffic is not significant. <br />11. The EIR for Main Place, competed in the 1990's, did not address the 2525 project; the EIR for 2525 did not <br />address the Main Place projects. The EIR for 2525 does not look at cumulative affects by ignoring the Main <br />Place project, but you can. <br />12. The developer has said this is moderate density apartment. It is high-density apartments. <br />13. The listed population of 955 is not as the EIR states "conservative". The "extensive" leasing agreement <br />they reference allows up to 1252 residents without being is violation of the lease. <br />YJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.