My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25G - AGMT METER INFRASTRUCTURE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
05/07/2019
>
25G - AGMT METER INFRASTRUCTURE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2019 6:17:26 PM
Creation date
5/2/2019 6:03:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25G
Date
5/7/2019
Destruction Year
2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
54 <br />AMI Feasibility Report I Client Name: City of Santa Ana <br />progresses on its AMI initiative - each poses a particular opportunity and challenge. A critical first <br />step is to identify the proposed procurement approach. <br />AMI projects contain significant technology and business partner elements that can impact the <br />efficacy of the solution. The City will have to evaluate the proposals carefully as a long term and <br />active support is required from the partners for sustainment of AMI. <br />The City will want to partner with best -in -class solution providers. In the case of AMI providers, <br />this involves the following elements: <br />o Industry advisor and consultant. <br />o Water meters. <br />• AMI solution. <br />• MDMS. <br />® Project implementation. <br />C7 System integration. <br />17 Deployment services. <br />❑ Support Services. <br />a Operation & Maintenance <br />Some partners can perform multiple roles. As an example, there are vendors that have both AMI <br />solutions and MDMS platforms, or companies that can provide industry advisor and project <br />implementation services. The system integration role can be delivered by the project <br />implementation lead or as a separate work stream. The deployment services should be left to those <br />companies that have experience performing this work. <br />The City will need to choose its partners based on key attributes that include the following: <br />❑ Experience - AMI projects are a unique type of project for utilities because they contain <br />significant IT components, field work, and organizational components and are highly visible. The <br />City should be wary of proponents that have limited AMI experience, and general water <br />experience is not sufficient. <br />o Proven Capabilities - Not all AMI projects have been equally successful, so the City must select <br />partners that have demonstrated the capability to perform the scope of services for this type of <br />projects. <br />® Scale - The City is not a large water utility and using partner's with small to medium utility <br />experience is important. This is especially true for the AMI solution and MDMS as the solution <br />offered by vendors must be cost effective. It is important that vendors must be able to provide <br />adequate resources and support to the City. <br />© Stability and Financial Strength - An AMI project will take a few years to complete and require <br />significant amount of resources and investment. The City must ensure its partners have the <br />ability to perform the services for the duration of the project. <br />25G-172 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.