Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT 2 <br />SPR No. 2017-09/DBA No. 2017-02 <br />May21, 2018 <br />Page 7 <br />The City is required to revisit the HOO before December 31, 2018 to evaluate any amendments to <br />the ordinance. On May 14, 2018, the Economic Development, Infrastructure, Budget and <br />Technology (EDIBT) Council Committee met. Staff presented a verbal update on the HOO, and the <br />Committee discussed HOO-related topics for discussion, including geographic dispersal of units <br />and incorporating affordable units into mixed -income projects. The HOO is silent on policies <br />regarding all -affordable housing projects or geographic dispersing of affordable housing. <br />Accordingly, these areas of discussions were not applied to analysis of the project. <br />3. Project Open Space <br />Although stated as a guideline in the regulating plan, the project's unit sizes are generally well <br />below the 1,200-square-foot average unit size objective. Under such circumstances, a project would <br />typically provide greater onsite open space per unit, either as private open space or as common <br />open space for the residents of the community. The applicant has considered this guideline and <br />proposes to compensate through a greater average private/common open space area of 104 <br />square feet per unit instead of the 100-square-foot minimum, which results in 2,200 additional <br />square feet of open space. However, given the large nature of the project and the reduction in <br />private, common, and publically accessible open space, the extra four (4) square feet per unit may <br />be insufficient to compensate for the overall open space reduction. In addition, only 12 units of the <br />552 total will have balconies or terraces. <br />4. Development Intensity and Requested Deviations <br />The project is proposing a project density of 80 units per acre, which is below the typical 90 units <br />per acre assumed by the District Center General Plan land use designation that is applied to the <br />project site. However, in reviewing the proposed project, staff drew comparisons against the <br />recently -entitled Madison mixed -use residential and commercial community at 200 North Cabrillo <br />Park Drive, also in the MEMU area. <br />The Madison was entitled with an overall density of 93 units per acre (260 units on 2.79 acres). This <br />project was able to meet all MEMU regulating plan's development standards, including open space <br />and building setbacks, with the exception of required onsite parking and maximum driveway widths, <br />both of which the City Council approved through variance applications. Staff analysis indicates that <br />the Madison was able to meet all MEMU standards due to the projects site plan, which features a <br />multi -level parking structure at the heart of the development. The location and multi -level nature of <br />the parking structure frees additional space on the project site that enables the development to <br />meet MEMU standards, including all forms of open space (publically accessible, common, and <br />private/per unit). <br />5. Reduction in Required Parking and Proposed Shuttle and Parking Valet Service <br />Staff has analyzed the proposed project and finds that there is potential that the project and <br />neighborhood may be impacted by the reduced parking. The City has identified the MEMU area for <br />high -intensity, mixed use development in order to reduce demands for parking and traffic impacts. <br />However, the MEMU area is still in transition, and portions including the MEMO area have yet to <br />60A-53 <br />