My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55C - RESO ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
06/18/2019
>
55C - RESO ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2019 4:56:14 PM
Creation date
6/13/2019 4:54:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
55C
Date
6/18/2019
Destruction Year
2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transportation Plan was presented, then vetted and approved by the Active Transportation Working <br />Group. In addition, the criteria are also consistent with neighboring cities and national best <br />Practices. Criteria included; Bike and Pedestrian Collisions, Public Support, Level of Traffic Stress, <br />CalEnviroscreen, Completes the Network, Completes the Corridor, Economic Efficiency, Bike -Pedestrian <br />Propensity Model. The prioritization process uses a weighted score determined by the Active <br />Transportation Working Group and follow up workshop input. <br />Once the prioritization process was completed, a total of 35 priority projects were selected to go into <br />further design detail. The remaining projects are important nonetheless and can be used for future <br />recommendations. These projects will create a network of complete streets that will improve non - <br />motorized and transit use throughout Santa Ana. Each priority project represents a variety of street <br />types that currently lack safe access and mobility for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non -motorized <br />modes. The following table is a summary of the top 35 recommended projects. nn <br />L] C <br />0 os i <br />I <br />t o -o- t -� •6 <br />1ZZ g, <br />Proposed Bikewoya swnuv�4a:Uv )_ �. J� <br />—�nmSLhfW4Use Pc:n // T F r -ST <br />—. Doss aese[anez ( j —� f ��ix�Ll-.r.0,_.�X � •^� � f _il <br />...noss as. a�nereaex«ous i , L nNt -rTj ^i � ,�.. "I <br />—nns Ht ax.. Roure ' / t _--0- 1•^c•• I <br />MrT <br />—aessrmwuuse ren � -.� � -, � T 1 rf"• O i . �O!r <br />—Crass M. ayde na<i J j .� Q, — D• 1 <br />Htevlaauynoposeealeways �, ! � 1 i <br />Top 35 Projects <br />The following table summarizes all 65 projects in terms of mileage. <br />Recommended Projects Summary <br />Facility Type <br />Miles <br />Class I: Multi -Use Path <br />9.55 <br />H <br />55C-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.