My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - PH - VMT AND CEQA GUIDELINES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
06/18/2019
>
75D - PH - VMT AND CEQA GUIDELINES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2019 5:36:02 PM
Creation date
6/13/2019 5:31:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75D
Date
6/18/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
250
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Ouality Act (2019) INITIAL STUDY <br />Table 1 <br />VMT Impact Thresholds <br />Methods <br />Project Threshold <br />Cumulative Threshold <br />daily VMT/SP. <br />project generates <br />inconsistent with the RTP/SCS. <br />VMT/SP above 15% <br />below the Countywide <br />A significant impact would occur if <br />average. <br />the project causes total daily VMT <br />within the City to be higher than the <br />no project alternative under <br />cumulative conditions. This analysis <br />should be performed using the <br />`project effect' method. <br />Transportation Projects (thresholds may apply for SB 743 or GHG purposes) <br />• OCTAM forecast of total <br />A significant impact <br />A significant impact would occur if <br />citywide daily VMTI <br />would occur if the <br />the project caused total daily VMT <br />project increased the <br />within the City to be higher than the <br />baseline VMT within the <br />no build alternative under <br />City. <br />cumulative conditions. <br />• Consistency check with <br />NA <br />A significant impact would occur if <br />SCAG RTP/SCS <br />the project is determined to be <br />inconsistent with the RTP/SCS. <br />The thresholds of significance set forth in Table 1 should be considered when <br />determining a proposed project's potential transportation impacts under Forms J and S of these <br />Local CEQA Guidelines. <br />5.10 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT. <br />Whenever there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record, that any of the <br />conditions set forth below may occur, the Lead Agency shall find that the project may have a <br />significant effect on the environment and thereby shall require preparation of an EIR: <br />(a) The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, <br />substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife <br />population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal <br />community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered <br />plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or <br />prehistory; <br />(b) The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the <br />disadvantage of long-term environmental goals; <br />I It is recommended that OCTAM is used to develop VMT estimates for transportation project impact assessment. <br />However, the analyst must verify the model results for sensitivity to changes in VMT. Alternatively, if the model is <br />not deemed appropriate, Robert Cevero's research on lane -mile elasticity and its relationship to VMT can be <br />referenced. <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines <br />CBest Best & Krieger LLP <br />75D-70 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.