My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-18_AGENDA PACKET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2018
>
11-26-2018
>
11-26-18_AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 2:22:53 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 2:22:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rebuttal to Developers View on Sunshine Meeting Sunshine Meeting Report ‐ Neighborhood Rebuttal‐Table View Page 3 of 14 2018‐11‐13 Land Use: COMMENT QUESTION REPORTED TO DEVELOPER DEVELOPER RESPONSE: NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE: 8. On this site you can put 40 single family/for sale homes and they will sell. The cost of urban infill sites such as this one (17mm) make it cost prohibitive to develop single family. In addition, this is a major thoroughfare with a mixture of uses and significant freeway noise, all making for the site to be incompatible for single family residences. So what is 17mm? The applicant admits it is a major thoroughfare with a mixture of uses and significant freeway noise. So why expose even more people to these issues? So…all the houses on Bush and any other street bordering 17th/5 fwy are now incompatible for single family residences? The increase in property values for those properties (we need proof) refutes that claim. We want no rezoning. It is incompatible for any housing. We agree with the developer with one addition…the major thoroughfare with a mixture of uses and significant freeway noise make this site incompatible for any residences…which is why it must remain zoned as it currently is for a maximum 3 story office building. 9. Oppose apartments of any kind. It is our understanding the neighbor’s impression of an apartment project is not consistent with what we intend to develop. In the upcoming weeks, we will launch a website detailing the quality of construction and vast amenities. The project will resemble a fine resort, not some of the underwhelming projects from years ago. Keep in mind, the folks that will occupy this community will make a minimum income of $58,000 per year, with an average income of $85,000 a year. We don’t buy it and would like to see how these numbers were derived. Based on current rents projections and assuming 30% of one’s income should be towards rent the minimum income for a studio apartment ($2000) would be $80,000. and a 3 bedroom ($3800) would be $152,000. Where are these jobs and do you really believe people not going to use cars? The average income of the overcrowded areas will not change and the density of this property will only drastically increase. 10. Our neighborhood is a jewel, don’t want your project it will damage our neighborhood. It is our intention to leave the community better than we found it. We intend to post on our website all of the benefits the project will bring to the City and the Community. Can’t wait to see this! 11. Rezone would take away our quality of life, some business use ok. Again, we are hopeful that the quality of the community will change these opinions and the neighbors will take the time to learn and better understand about the community and City benefits. Third time answer has been provided.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.