My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2 - COMBINED PUBLIC COMMENTS_2525 N MAIN STREET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
01-14-19
>
2 - COMBINED PUBLIC COMMENTS_2525 N MAIN STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:09:36 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:04:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
379
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />We need to consider that if this project is stopped, which I don't think they should, that the next one <br />may be worse for all parties (including the city due to residential development fees) and due to the <br />current zoning on that property, we may be stuck with what we can get. We have an opportunity <br />right now to be sure that any positive changes to the project that can be made, are considered. <br /> <br />Residential Property Values <br />There is a lot of concern about what a high density development will do for our property values. <br />Sure, there may be a short term decrease as those who are so opposed to living next to apartments <br />decide to sell their homes despite the residents of 2525 quite possibly paying more per month for <br />their rent than our cost of ownership. However, I believe that the residents of 2525 will be the <br />future home buyers of our houses when we are ready to move on. If they are willing to pay the <br />prices proposed, they will soon be trying to buy a home- and hopefully in our great neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Additionally, if folks do move, which I hope that they do not, they likely will be replaced by new <br />buyers who will pay higher property taxes due to Prop 13 value resets to fair value. This is not a <br />reason to approve the project but just a silver lining in case folks do intend to move because of this <br />project. <br /> <br />Conclusion <br />There are positives that can come about from this project if we keep an open mind when comparing <br />it to the existing 3-story building zoning…less traffic, more city revenue, more low income housing <br />availability through development fees, etc…. Yes, there are negatives such as a possible lack of fit <br />with the Park Santiago neighborhood and also a change from the current status quo of a vacant <br />building and these need to be weighed and considered when viewing this project. <br /> <br />Please consider all voices and not just those that speak the loudest or in the most numbers, but also <br />consider the entire city. We cannot look at this in a bubble but must look at what is best for the <br />whole city. As a resident of North Santa Ana, I want the best not only for my current neighbors, but <br />my fellow residents who live in a completely different part of town and also future neighbors who do <br />not even know they will be moving into Santa Ana in the future. I trust you will also and as such, <br />please consider all aspects of this project when determining the best course of action. <br /> <br />Thanks for your consideration.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.