My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2 - COMBINED PUBLIC COMMENTS_2525 N MAIN STREET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
01-14-19
>
2 - COMBINED PUBLIC COMMENTS_2525 N MAIN STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:09:36 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:04:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
379
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2525 North Main Street <br />January 14, 2019 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />This project is required to comply with the City’s Housing Oppo rtunity Ordinance (HOO). To satisfy <br />the provisions of the HOO, applicant is proposing to pay an in‐lieu fee in excess of $6,000,000. <br />See Table 4 below for a breakdown of the proposed HOO fee. <br />Table 4: Housing Opportunity Fee Summary <br />Habitable Square Footage Inclusionary Housing Fee Estimated Fee <br />404,746 $15 per square foot $6,071,190 <br />*As measured from the exterior walls of the residential units. This calculation does not include exterior <br />hallways, common areas, landscape, open space or exterior stairways* <br />Analysis of the Issues <br />Environmental Impact Report <br />The applicant submitted a development proposal that requires the approval of several <br />discretionary applications. Given the size and location of the project, as well as the proposed <br />zoning and general plan modifications, extensive environmental review was needed. After <br />completion of the Initial Study for the project, it was determined that the California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) required the preparation and certification of an environmental <br />impact report (EIR) for this project. The purpose of an EIR is to identify the significant effects on <br />the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to the project, and to indicate the manner <br />in which those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. To determine what potential <br />effects would be caused by the project, the EIR analyzed issues related to Aesthetics; Air Quality; <br />Biological Resources; Cultural/Historic Resources; Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Hazards and <br />Hazardous Materials; Land Use and Planning; Noise; Population and Housing; Public Services; <br />Transportation and Circulation; Tribal Cultural Resources; Utilities and Service Systems; and <br />Energy. <br />On February 12, 2018, the Initial Study and Notice of Preparation were released to solicit <br />comments regarding the scope and content of the Draft EIR (DEIR). A scoping meeting was held <br />on March 1, 2018 with approximately 164 people in attendance and a total of 163 written <br />comment letters were received at the conclusion of the 30‐day public comment period. <br />The comments were reviewed and additional areas of analysis and studies were added to the <br />scope of the Draft EIR as appropriate. The comments are included as Appendix A of the Draft EIR. <br />The Draft EIR analyzed the direct and indirect impacts resulting from construction and operation <br />of the proposed project. In addition to analyzing fourteen environmental topic areas, the EIR also <br />evaluated three options for access and egress to the project. The analysis included Main Street <br />access only as proposed (Option A), access from Main Street plus a secondary access/egress <br />driveway at the Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park intersection (Option B), and <br />access/egress from both Main Street and Edgewood Road (Option C). <br />Three project alternatives were also analyzed within the document. These included a no build <br />alternative, where the existing approximately 80,000 square foot building would remain as is and <br />be reoccupied by an office use (Alternative 1); a reduced multi‐family project consisting of a <br />Commented [DH9]: FYI… <br />At $210,000 to $240,000 to build a low <br />income housing unit this equates to 25 to 29 <br />units. <br />Commented [DH10]: This should be a red <br />flag to everyone! <br />Commented [DH11]: I do not see the <br />additional areas of analysis that were added. <br />This should be identified.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.