My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6 - GPA19-01; AA19-01_651 W SUNFLOWER AVENUE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
04-22-19
>
6 - GPA19-01; AA19-01_651 W SUNFLOWER AVENUE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:40:29 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:38:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Legacy Sunflower Apartments Page 13 <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 14, 2019 <br /> <br />measures based on an earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL <br />IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. <br /> <br /> I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all <br />potentially significant effects a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to <br />that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are <br />imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Signature: Date <br /> <br /> <br />Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: <br /> <br />1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately <br />supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. <br />A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the <br />impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault <br />rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors <br />as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based <br />on a project-specific screening analysis). <br /> <br />2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, <br />cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational <br />impacts. <br /> <br />3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist <br />answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, <br />or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence <br />that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when <br />the determination is made, an EIR is required. <br /> <br />4. “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the <br />incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Signif icant Impact” to a <br />“Less-than-significant Impact”. The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly <br />explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from “Earlier <br />Analyses,” as described in (5) below may be cross-referenced). <br /> <br />5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an <br />effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). <br />In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: <br /> <br />a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. <br /> <br />b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the <br />scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, <br />and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier <br />analysis. <br />6-35
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.