Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Legacy Sunflower Apartments Page 14 <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration – March 14, 2019 <br /> <br /> <br />c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures <br />Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier <br />document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. <br /> <br />6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for <br />potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or <br />outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the <br />statement is substantiated. <br /> <br />7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or <br />individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. <br /> <br />8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lea d <br />agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's <br />environmental effects in whatever format is selected. <br /> <br />9) The explanation of each issue should identify: <br /> <br />a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and <br /> <br />b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. <br /> <br />N. ISSUES: <br /> <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No Impact <br />I. AESTHETICS: Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: <br /> <br /> a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic <br />vista? <br /> b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including <br />but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and <br />historic buildings within a state scenic highway? <br /> c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the <br />existing visual character or quality of public views <br />of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are <br />those that are experienced from publicly accessible <br />vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized <br />area, would the project conflict with applicable <br />zoning and other regulations governing scenic <br />quality? <br /> d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />that will adversely affect day or nighttime views in <br />the area? <br /> <br />6-36