My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7- AA19-04; TPM19-01;DA18-02_2800 N MAIN STREET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
05-13-19
>
7- AA19-04; TPM19-01;DA18-02_2800 N MAIN STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:50:43 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:46:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
598
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In addition, comparable trip generation rates were studied for <br /> high density commercial retail/office developments. It was noted during <br /> the Phase Two TSIP study effort that the MMTS/SATC Model tended to <br /> forecast less traffic, particularly for large scale connercial <br /> developments, than some trip generation studies would otherwise <br /> indicate. Such a relationship seemed reasonable since it was recognized <br />L that large coninercial developments offered better opportunities for ride <br /> sharing, transit and staggering of work hours. However, rather than to <br /> simply rely on this intuitive assumption, comparisons were conducted on <br />U commercial developments similar to that proposed in Fashion Square to <br /> ensure the trip generation model was realistic. <br />I-; <br /> To the extent possible, an intersection level capacity <br /> analysis was conducted as part of the FIR traffic study. The Phase Two <br /> TSIP Study conducted a capacity analysis at the arterial scale in <br />L sufficient depth to size the main arteries but had not extended th~ <br /> study to the detail of intersection level capacity analysis. Such was <br /> attempted in the FIR traffic study, primarily for the purpose of <br />LI comparison with the classical Intersect~on Capacity Analysis (ICU) <br /> approach, but the effort was abandoned. Highway assignments are <br />U, forecast on an individual link by link basis, but intersection turning <br /> movements are not readily obtainable. Assumptions would have to be made <br />b as to the percentage of thru and turning traffic at each intersection <br /> and these assumptions significantly influence the resulting capacity <br />L evaluations. Existing traffic data is available but does not <br /> necessarily provide an indication of future turning patterns because the <br /> proposed roadway network is substantially different than present. As a <br />U result, the comparison of ICU's was abandoned and a more generalistic <br /> approach taken whereby individual intersection approach volumes were <br />ii <br /> compared against capacity to ensure a minimum level of Service D was <br /> provided. The typical cross section of Main Street is presumed to <br /> provide a median wide enough for dual left turn lanes. <br /> The proposed expansion of Fashion Square is one of the first <br /> projects to proceed after completion of the Phase Two TSIP Study. The <br /> 86
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.