My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-19_AGENDA PACKET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
05-28-19
>
05-28-19_AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2019 4:54:56 PM
Creation date
8/16/2019 4:53:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2019) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT <br /> <br /> <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 7-15 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />7.21 ANALYSIS OF CUMULATIVE IMPACTS. <br />An EIR must discuss cumulative impacts when the project’s incremental effect is <br />“cumulatively considerable” as defined in Local Guidelines Section 11.14. When the City is <br />examining a project with an incremental effect that is not “cumulatively considerable,” it need not <br />consider that effect significant, but must briefly describe the basis for this conclusion. A project’s <br />contribution may be less than cumulatively considerable if the project is required to implement or <br />fund its fair share of a mitigation measure designed to alleviate the cumulative impact. When <br />relying on a fee program or mitigation measure(s), the City must identify facts and analysis <br />supporting its conclusion that the cumulative impact is less than significant. <br />The City may determine that a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative effect is <br />not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in a previously <br />approved plan or mitigation program that provides specific requirements that will avoid or <br />substantially lessen the cumulative problem in the geographic area in which the project is located. <br />Such plans and programs may include, but are not limited to: <br />(1) Water quality control plans; <br />(2) Air quality attainment or maintenance plans; <br />(3) Integrated waste management plans; <br />(4) Habitat conservation plans; <br />(5) Natural community conservation plans; and/or <br />(6) Plans or regulations for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. <br />When relying on such a regulation, plan, or program, the City should explain how <br />implementing the particular requirements of the plan, regulation or program will ensure that the <br />project’s incremental contribution to the cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable. <br />A cumulative impact consists of an impact that is created as a result of the combination of <br />the project evaluated in the EIR together with other projects causing related impacts. An EIR <br />should not discuss impacts that do not result in part from the project evaluated in the EIR. <br />The discussion of cumulative impacts in an EIR must focus on the cumulative impacts to <br />which the identified other projects contribute, rather than on the attributes of other projects that do <br />not contribute to the cumulative impact. The discussion of significant cumulative impacts must <br />include either of the following: <br />(1) A list of past, present, and probable future projects causing related or cumulative <br />impacts including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the City; or <br />(2) A summary of projections contained in an adopted local, regional or statewide plan, <br />or related planning document, that describes or evaluates conditions contributing to <br />the cumulative effect. Such plans may include: a general plan, regional <br />3 -111
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.