06-10-19_AGENDA PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ER No. 2017-140, AA No June 10, 2019 Page 3 2019-02, CUP No. 2019-12 & VA No. 2019-01 Item Information Uses SAMC Sections 41-365(a), 41-365(q) and 41- Zoning Code Sections 365.5 h Development & Operational SMAC Section 41-378 to 41-386 & 41-374 Affected Standards Entitlements SAMC Chapter 41, Article V, Division I and Division II Project Background and Chronology The existing restaurant building was built in 1960 as a drive -in -restaurant. The building was last occupied by Antojitos Don Chepe restaurant and has been vacant since 2016. In November 2017, the Planning Division received this development application request and has been working with the applicant to refine the site plan and building design. In accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance, the applicant held two community meetings on December 12, 2017 and February 8, 2018 to review the proposed development and receive feedback from the community and adjacent property owners and residents. A total of seven members of the public attended. The community raised concerns about safety, potential traffic impacts, and the sale of alcoholic beverages. The sale of alcoholic beverages at this location is not allowed per the City's alcoholic beverage ordinance. On May 13, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the project. At the public hearing, the applicant expressed concerns with the mitigation measures and proposed conditions of approval. The applicant's concerns and their resolutions are listed below: (a) Concern: Transportation Mitigation Measure No. 1 restricting access driveways along Daisy Avenue to left -in, right -in and right -out only. Resolution: The applicant submitted a revised traffic site analysis (TSA), attached hereto within Exhibit 13, to address and correct the southerly Daisy Avenue driveway restrictions. The revised TSA was reviewed and approved by the City's Public Works Agency. In addition, the Final MND has been revised to reflect this change and Transportation Mitigation Measure No. 1 has been removed. (b) Concem: Condition No. 4 of the CUP requiring an alternative trash enclosure location/design that complies with the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principals. Resolution: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to address Condition No. 4 of the CUP, attached hereto as Exhibit 7. The trash enclosure has been pushed to the rear of the property along the south property line and the pedestrian walkway leading from Daisy Avenue to the front of the convenience store is now located in front of the trash enclosure. The revised site plan has been determined to be acceptable by staff and, therefore, the condition has been removed. 1-3