My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESONDENCE - 60A (COMMENTS)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
08/20/2019
>
CORRESONDENCE - 60A (COMMENTS)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2019 11:07:44 AM
Creation date
8/20/2019 2:24:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Letter of Support re Item 60A Request for Approval of a Density Bonus Agreement to Allow a <br />552 Unit Affordable Rental Project at 2110, 2114, and 2020 East First Street <br />August 20, 2019 <br />p. 2 <br />Coalition released its Out of Reach Report.' The report highlights Orange County's rising <br />housing crisis and exorbitant housing costs continue to challenge and affect Orange County's <br />lower income working families. According to the report, workers need to earn $39.17 an hour to <br />afford the rent for a typical two -bedroom apartment in Orange County. The typical fair market <br />rent (FMR) for a two -bedroom unit here is $2,037 per month, ranking Orange County among the <br />nation's top 10 most expensive metropolitan areas in the nation. The annual income needed to <br />afford a two -bedroom FMR is $81,480 and a minimum wage worker needs to work at least 131 <br />hours per week-33 jobs to afford a 2-bedroom FMR apartment. The report underscores the <br />crisis facing Orange County Residents, and the housing crisis facing Santa Ana residents is <br />especially acute. Many of the families that we assist are in desperate need of decent, affordable <br />housing, such as the project that the developers propose with this Unit. In the City —a majority <br />renter city, significant need exists to address and provide housing opportunities for all economic <br />segments of the community. Families in the City use the majority of their incomes (over 50%) to <br />pay for housing costs. This is unsustainable and it has led to actual and economic homelessness. <br />As residents struggle to find available and affordable housing in the City, rents have continually <br />increased. We have heard stories of landlords demanding that tenants pay rents that are in excess <br />of 50-80% of their income, or face eviction and almost certain homelessness or relocation out of <br />the City, while this Council has remained silent to requests for a moratorium on rent increases or <br />just cause eviction ordinance protections. As of April 2019, the average rent for a one -bedroom <br />apartment in the City is $1,938 per month, while the average rent for a two -bedroom apartment is <br />$2,582 per month .2 This Unit proposes to help ameliorate the crisis by adding 552 units to the <br />housing stock in the City. Accordingly, the City Council should embrace this Unit and not try to <br />find ways to crush it, as it will bring much needed affordable multi -family housing to the <br />residents of the City. <br />Pacific Companies and Jamboree Housing Corporation Are Eligible for a Density Bonus <br />Exce tp ion <br />The Density Bonus is a state mandate. An applicant who meets the requirements of the state law <br />is entitled to receive the density bonus and other benefits as a matter of right. (See Gov. Code <br />§65195, et seq.) A jurisdiction is required to grant the concession or incentive requested by the <br />applicant unless the jurisdiction makes a written finding based on substantial evidence of a <br />specific, adverse impact upon public health and safety, or on historic resources. (Gov. Code <br />§65195(d)(1)(B).) <br />The Staff Report for the June 4, 2018 Planning Commission hearing declared that there are no <br />historic resources in the immediate vicinity that this project would affect and the project's <br />designs and operations, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety. Moreover, none of <br />the councilmembers during the City Council meetings of May 7, 2019, May 21, 2019, or June 4, <br />2019, expressed concern with the project's impact on public health, public safety, or nearby <br />historic resources. Because the Unit is a 100% affordable development and the City Council has <br />failed to produce the required written findings based on substantial evidence of a specific, <br />'See 30th Anniversary Out of Reach Report, National Low Income Housing Coalition, <br />https:Hroports.nlihc.org/sites/default/files/oor/OOR_2019.pdf (last visited on August 19, 2019) <br />2 See www.rentjungle.com/average-rent-in-santa-ana-rent-trends/ (Last visited on August 19, 2019). <br />601 Civic Center Drive West • Santa Ana, CA 92701-4002 • (714) 541-1010 • Fax (714) 541-5157 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.