Laserfiche WebLink
Letter of Support re Item 60,4 Request for Approval of a Density Bonus Agreement to Allow a <br />552 Unit Affordable Rental Project at 2110, 2114, and 2020 East First Street <br />August 20, 2019 <br />p. 3 <br />adverse impact of the Unit on public health, public safety, or historic resources, the City Council <br />should grant the parking concession requested by the developers as a matter of right. <br />Denying This Proiect Would Constitute Intentional Housing Discrimination <br />A. Denial of the 552 Unit Affordable Rental Project Constitutes Intentional Land Use <br />Discrimination against low-income people under Government Code section 65008 <br />If the City denies the Unit, it would constitute intentional land use discrimination against low- <br />income persons under Government Code section 65008. Section 65008 renders null and void any <br />action that denies employment of residence, landownership, tenancy or other interest in land to <br />individuals based on protected classes, including intended occupancy of any residential <br />development by persons of very low, low, moderate, or middle income. This prohibition applies <br />to any power exercised under the authority of Title 7. §§ 65008(a)(1) and (2). Additionally, <br />Section 65008 prohibits local government agencies, including cities and counties from taking <br />actions, including in the administration of ordinances, or approval of developments, which <br />prohibit or discriminate against any residential development or shelter because the development <br />is intended for occupancy by "person[s] or families of very low, low, moderate, or middle <br />income." (Gov. Code §65008(b)(1) (Q.) <br />B. Denial of the 552 Unit Affordable Rental Project Would Violate Santa Ana's Duty to <br />Affirmatively Further Fair Housing <br />Additionally, should the City Council deny the developers' request for a permit to construct the <br />Unit, it would constitute fair housing discrimination, as it violates the City of Santa Ana's duty to <br />affirmatively further fair housing under federal and state law.' Affirmatively furthering fair <br />housing requires the City to take meaningful action that, taken together, addresses significant <br />disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns <br />with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically <br />concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining <br />compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws. The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits <br />practices that "actually or predictably result[] in a disparate impact on a group of persons or <br />creates, increases, reinforces, or perpetuates segregated housing patterns.i' Further, California <br />Fair Employment and Housing Act makes it "unlawful ... to discriminate through public or <br />private land use practices, decisions, and authorizations `that have the effect, regardless of intent, <br />of unlawfully discriminating on the basis of [a] protected class."' 5 Accordingly, denying the <br />developers the opportunity to build this needed Unit will continue to reduce the amount of <br />housing that would otherwise be available for lower -income households in the City, and <br />therefore could be construed as having disparate negative impact on certain racial and ethnic <br />groups. <br />s 42 U.S.C. 3608 and Executive Order 12892 <br />'Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Regs, Implementation of the Fair Housing Aet's Discriminatory Effects <br />Standard, 24 C.F.R. § 100.500(a), 78 Fed. Reg. 11482 (Feb. 15, 2013). <br />s Gov. Code §12955.8, subd. (b). <br />601 Civic Center Drive West • Santa Ana, CA 92701-4002 • (714) 541-1010 • Fax (714) 541-5157 <br />