Laserfiche WebLink
Receive and File — Pilot Parking Study Status <br />October 1, 2019 <br />Page 3 <br />Record Search — Because many of the multi -family residential private properties were <br />not accessible, staff determined on -site parking space counts by using available <br />planning maps, original land use entitlement records, the City's Santa Ana Property <br />Identification Network database, the City's GovClarity geographic information system <br />aerial maps, and Orange County Tax Assessor data. <br />Contacted Property Managers — Staff called property managers to inquire on their <br />property's parking allocation. <br />Demand <br />To determine demand for parking, staff requested and received information from the Department <br />of Motor Vehicles (DMV) regarding the number of vehicles registered for each residential address <br />within each pilot study district. The data provided by the DMV included over 27,800 registered <br />vehicles within the two districts. During the process of assigning a home to each vehicle for <br />geocoding and mapping, staff encountered inconsistencies in the formatting of address data, <br />resulting in manual data manipulation and mapping before any analysis could be performed. Staff <br />has completed the process of reconciling the addressing data while concurrently, manually <br />consolidating the information of the parking availability (supply) inventory (from field and record <br />search) into a compatible Excel spreadsheet for comparison and analysis to the demand data <br />provided by the DMV. <br />Potential Remedies- Increase Supply <br />The second part of the study includes identifying locations where additional on- and off-street <br />parking could potentially be created near the impacted residential areas. These sources of parking <br />could be: <br />Additional Parking in Existing Multi -Family Residential Complexes <br />Management of multi -unit properties that have flat parking spaces are being contacted to explore <br />their interest on a variety of options including vehicle lifts on their property. Initial feedback from <br />the property managers was not positive, as there were several concerns related to maintenance <br />and repairs of the lifts. In addition, property managers are being asked to remind tenants to use the <br />existing on -site spaces for parking as intended, rather than for other uses such as storage. <br />Street Parking <br />Staff identified street segments where parking was known or likely to exist in the past, but had been <br />prohibited in response to complaints unrelated to traffic safety from homeowners, PD, PRCSA, or <br />others. The reports ranged from nuisance type complaints such as nighttime noise, littering, and <br />criminal activity. These areas of parking restrictions are typically on streets not fronting residential <br />properties. Parking could be reinstituted on: <br />• Arterial and collector streets on the side or rear yard of residential properties <br />• Neighborhood streets fronting City parks and other uses <br />19C-3 <br />