Laserfiche WebLink
GPA No. 2019-02, VAR No. 2019-04 <br />August 26, 2019 <br />Page 3 <br />Proiect Analvsis <br />General Plan Amendment <br />The applicant is applying for a general plan amendment in order to re -designate the property <br />proposed for development to General Commercial (GC). According to the General Plan, the General <br />Commercial designation applies to commercial corridors and areas that are highly visible and are <br />critical arterial transportation corridors. The subject property is proposed to be changed from a Low - <br />Density Residential (LR-7) land use designation to GC. The change will make the property's General <br />Plan land use designation consistent with the current zoning of the site, which is C-1. Currently, the <br />Euclid Street corridor has properties with inconsistent general plan designations and zoning districts <br />but are developed with commercial uses. This amendment will create consistency with those <br />additional properties in the vicinity that are already developed with a commercial use and eventually <br />through a comprehensive general plan amendment, those inconsistencies will be clarified. <br />In addition, these properties are currently improved with commercial uses including professional and <br />medical office buildings, eating establishments, and mixed retail and service uses that provide <br />neighborhood facilities and services to the nearby residential properties to the east and west of the <br />Euclid Street corridor. The general plan amendment will provide consistency with the existing uses <br />and will make the properties consistent with the zoning district. <br />Variance for Reduced Lot Size and Front Yards <br />Pursuant to SAMC Section 41-632 (a) (2), a variance application can be filed from the development <br />standards of the zoning district. Variance requests are governed by Section 41-638 (2) of the <br />SAMC. Variances may be granted when it can be shown that there exists a special circumstance <br />related to the property, is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property <br />rights, will not be detrimental to the public or surrounding property, and will not adversely affect the <br />General Plan. In analyzing the multiple variance requests, staff believes that the following analysis <br />warrants staff's recommendation of approval for the variance. <br />The zoning code requires a 15-foot landscaped setback along both Euclid Street and Fourth Street. <br />The subject property is already deficient in available land in order to meet the minimum lot size <br />required for development in the Community Commercial (C-1) zoning district. Pursuant to Sec. 41- <br />373 of the SAMC, lots in the C-1 zoning district require a 15,000 square foot minimum size to develop. <br />The deficiency for the site is by 141 square feet, which equated to less than one (1) percent. Through <br />the review of the project, staff identified that the final design of the building and lot would suffer losses <br />to the size of the building if the 15-foot requirement for the front yard setback was applied. In order <br />forthe applicant to preserve as much property rights to develop the site to its full potential, staff worked <br />with the applicant to design a project that would offer different front yard setback distances. Special <br />consideration would be taken to architectural design of the building, articulation on a vertical and <br />horizontal plane, in order to gain a physical appearance that the building is not located directly on the <br />property line. In some locations the yards will be reduced to 5 feet, requiring a variance. The final <br />75A-11 <br />