75A - PH KARA GRANT APPEAL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the quality of life in the City." As discussed above, there are little economic benefits of car washes, they occupy prime commercial property and provide few employment opportunities within the City. Accordingly, approving the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project is completely contrary to Policy 2.5, as well as 2.6, which is to encourage employment opportunities, and Policy 2.9 — to support developments with safe and attractive business environments, since the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project has adverse environmental impacts, including traffic and noise, which are discussed in the following section. 2. The Car Wash Project Will Have Significant Impacts on Traffic and Noise. a) The Car Wash Proiect's Revised Traffic Study is Incomplete and Outdated; Current/Complete Data Indicates Significant Impacts on Traffic. In order for the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project to be categorically exempt from CEQA review as an infill development project, the Car Wash Project must not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Robert I{ahn, P.E. of RIK- Engineering Group, Inc., prepared a peer review of the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project revised Traffic Study, dated May 17, 2019, prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan. Attached as Exhibit D is RK Engineering's Peer Review (the "Peer Review"). In light of the Planning Commission's inadequate notice for the hearing on the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project (discussed below), the Conklin were unable to obtain an expert to conduct this analysis before that hearing. At the September 9te hearing, the Conklins requested the Commission to continue the hearing on the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project to afford them and other affected parties adequate time to protect their interests. The Commission did not continue the hearing. In short, RK Engineering ("RKE") finds the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project failed to evaluate critical data, which if included would likely have shown a significant impact on traffic. First, the revised traffic study for the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project failed to evaluate weekend traffic and trip generation data. RK Engineering found that the traffic study only reviewed weekday (7-9 am and 4-6 pm) traffic conditions. Express car washes, like the proposed Russell Fischer car wash, actually have peak traffic generation on Saturdays at approximately 1:00 pm or 2:00 pm. Also, the commercial area around the site would have significant traffic conditions on a Saturday. Omitting weekend data from the traffic analysis has a significant effect on the findings set forth in the revised traffic study. (See Exhibit D, pp. 3-5.) RKE has recently collected substantial trip generation data for other express car washes located in Santa Ana. That trip generation data is included as Table 4-1 to the Peer Review (see Exhibit D). Significantly, the Saturday trip generation for each of the car washes analyzed is 50% higher on Saturdays than during the weekday conditions. Like these express car washes, the Russell Fischer car wash will similarly have weekend trip generations that are 50% higher than weekday conditions, and the revised traffic study omits this data entirely — this is a serious omission that appears throughout the study. In addition, it is possible that the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project could have even higher than 13 75A-23