My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH KARA GRANT APPEAL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/15/2019
>
75A - PH KARA GRANT APPEAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2019 5:26:14 PM
Creation date
10/10/2019 4:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
10/15/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
average trip counts because it is permitted to have freeway signage identifying/advertising its location <br />and use. No other car wash in Santa Ana is known to have such signage. <br />RKE found that the Express Car Wash Trip Generation shown on page 3-82 and page 3-90 <br />(Table 5-1) of the revised traffic study for the Car Wash Project should include a Saturday analysis <br />because the proposed car wash will generate approximately 50% more trips during a Saturday than on a <br />weekday. Likewise, for the Existing Plus Project and Future conditions analysis, a Saturday analysis <br />needs to be evaluated, and tables 8-1 and 8-2 on pages 3-105 and 3-107, respectively, should include a <br />Saturday analysis. Accordingly, RKE found the revised traffic study incomplete because it needs to <br />include a Saturday traffic analysis for each of the different timeframes that are evaluated. Furthermore, <br />the traffic study should utilize typical trip generation for an express car wash during those timeframes to <br />fully evaluate whether the Car Wash Project will have a significant impact on traffic. <br />Second, RKE found that a traffic safety analysis of the intersection of North Tustin Avenue at <br />4th Street is crucial and must be performed. (See Exhibit D, p. 5.) This particular intersection "has a <br />significant amount of peak hour and daily traffic, and any increase in traffic generated by the proposed <br />project could potentially increase the collision rate at this intersection." (Id.) RKE reviewed the <br />collisions at the intersection and found "the collision rate is significantly higher than would be expected <br />at this type of intersection." Specifically, "[t]he ten year average collision rate at this intersection is 0.37 <br />collissions per million entering vehicles ... [and] the most recent collision rate during the past three <br />years (2016-2018) the collision rate has increased to 0.43 collisions per million entering vehicles." (Id.) <br />Significantly, RKE found that "any increase in traffic generated by the proposed [Russell Fischer Car <br />Wash] [P]ooject could potentially increase the collission rate at this intersection." (Id. and Appendix B, <br />S WITRS data for Intersection of N. Tustin Ave. and 4a' Street.) <br />Third, the site plan for the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project that is shown on page 3-68 of the <br />revised Traffic Study (Figure 2-2) includes a full driveway access on N. Tustin Avenue. This driveway <br />is located approximately 240-feet from the intersection of Tustin Avenue at 4th Street. RKE found this <br />distance to be too close for allowing the subject driveway to provide fall service access with all turning <br />movements, since it would interfere with the northbound left turn pocket on Tustin Avenue. <br />Accordingly, site plan modifications for the Russell Fischer Car Wash Project are necessary to include a <br />fully operative, full service access driveway. Moreover, the revised traffic study provides no <br />explanation on what the Car Wash Project "re-route" is for, as shown on page 3-73 and 3-74 (Figures 3- <br />2 and 3-3). RKE inquires what aspect of the Car Wash Project caused the re-route of traffic? Since the <br />traffic entering and exiting the Project site is at an intersection that is already extremely congested and <br />accident prone, this clarification is important to evaluate the impacts on traffic. <br />On pages 3-86 and 3-87 of the revised traffic study (Figures 5-3 and 5-4), the Russel Fischer Car <br />Wash Project volumes do not appear to match the Project net trip generation in Table 5-1, and the Trip <br />Distributions on pages 3-84 and 3-85 (Figures 5-1 and 5-2). RKE found that it is unclear how the <br />project only volumes were calculated, and inquired whether the traffic study included the full project trip <br />14 <br />75A-24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.