Laserfiche WebLink
*:/ : 11-1 h WA <br />d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number <br />of people? <br />Less Than Significant Impact. The threshold for odor is if a project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to <br />SCAQMD Rule 402, Nuisance, which states: <br />A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or <br />other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number <br />of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such <br />persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to <br />business or property. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from <br />agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals. <br />The type of facilities that are considered to have objectionable odors include wastewater treatments plants, <br />compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating <br />operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical <br />manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities. <br />The proposed project would develop and operate two new community parks, which would not fall within the <br />types of uses that are associated with foul odors that constitute a public nuisance. During construction activities, <br />construction equipment exhaust and application of concrete would temporarily generate odors. Operational <br />activities from city park maintenance and the use of landscape equipment would also temporarily generate <br />odors. However, construction and operation related odor emissions would be temporary, intermittent, and <br />would not affect a significant number of people. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. <br />3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br />Would the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species <br />identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or <br />regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />Less Than Significant Impact. <br />6th Street Site <br />6th Street Site is vacant with three trees and no native vegetation suitable to provide habitat for sensitive of <br />special status species. There is no riparian habitat on of near the site. The site has been previously disturbed <br />and surrounded by various urban development No endangered, fare, threatened, of special status plant of <br />wildlife species designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and <br />Wildlife (CDFW), of California Native Plant Society (CNPS) are known to occur on this site. No known <br />regional wildlife corridors of any other sensitive biological areas as indicated by the USFWS Critical Habitat <br />portal of CDFW BIOS (USFWS 2018, CDFW 2018). <br />75C-83 <br />