Laserfiche WebLink
*:/ : 11-1 h WA <br />5111111 ie1:7.110 N *9111:111:K <br />Would the project <br />a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to <br />15064.5? <br />No Impact. Section 15064.5 defines historic resources as resources listed of determined to be eligible for <br />listing by the State Historical Resources Commission, a local register of historical resources, of the lead agency. <br />Generally a resource is considered "historically significant' if it meets one of the following criteria: <br />i) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of <br />California's history and cultural heritage; <br />ii) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; <br />iii) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region of method of construction, <br />or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; <br />iv) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. <br />Both replacement park sites are currently vacant and do not contain any above -grade structures. Both sites do <br />not contain historically significant resources that are listed, or identified as eligible for listing on the National <br />Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and the City of <br />Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (SARHP) (Rincon 2016a, 2016b, Santa Ana 2017). No impact would <br />occur, and no mitigation measures are required. <br />b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to <br />15064.5? <br />Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. <br />6th Street Site <br />A cultural records search from the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), South Central <br />Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) was performed as part of the Cultural Resources Study prepared in 2016. <br />The SCCIC fecofds search identified 67 previously recorded cultural resources within a 0.5-mile fadius of the <br />6th Street Site, but none within the site boundaries. All 67 records pertained to standing structures and not <br />archaeological fesources. Additionally, an intensive pedestrian survey of The 6th Street Site was performed on <br />December 17, 2015, at which time, the subject site was developed with residential buildings and structures, and <br />paved surfaces. The archaeological component of the survey concentrated on inspecting all open space areas, <br />and inspecting for the presence of soil discoloration that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, <br />and features indicative of the former presence of structures of buildings. The field survey did not identify any <br />previously unidentified archaeological resources. However, it is possible that previously unidentified <br />archaeological resources could be unearthed during ground excavation. Therefore, mitigation measure is <br />75C-86 <br />