20A - AA- JAG FUNDS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

U.S. Department oflustice Office oflustice Programs j Bureau of Justice Assistance i PROJOCrtafMDER 2017 1)1-10(-0990 AWARD CONTINUATION SHEET Grant AWARD DATE 11N1,301B PAGE CI OF 21 SPECUL CONDITIONS IMPORTANTNOTE: Any questions about the meaning orscope of this condition should bedirected to OIP, before award accaptance. 54. Authority to obligate award funds contingenton compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373;unallowablecosts, obligation to notify A. 716eIf91igim(piegtioh�Y4�N' bak�5veisaufentihe time nfthe obligatiov,the "program oractivity" of the recipient (prof any subrecipient at any tier that is a tither a Stale or unit of local govermnent or a "public" institution of higher education) that a funded in whole or in part with award funds is subjectto any "informadoncommunication restriction." B. In addition, with respect to any project costs it incurs "at risk," the recipient may not obligate award funds to reimburse iuelfif— at the time it incurs such tests — the'program or activity" of@erecildent(or ofany subrecipient at any tier that is a either a State or unit of local government or a "public' institution of higher education) that would be reimbursed in whole or in part with award finds was subject to any "information cnuau nicafion restriction" C. Any drawdown of award funds by'the recipient shall be considered, for all proposes, to be a material representation by OSe recipient n OJP that, as ofthe date the recipient requests the drawdown, the recipient and all subrecipienls (regardless oftier) are incompliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373. D. The recipient must promptly notify OJP(in writing) if the recipient, from its requisite monitoring of compliance with award conditions or otherwise, has credible evidence that indicates that the funded "program or activity" of the recipient, or of any subrecipient at any tier that is either a State or a local gow avant or a "public' imliudion of higher education, maybe subject to any "intomtetion-communication restriction." In addition, any subaward(a[ any tier) to a subrecipient that is either a State or local government or a "public" institution of higher education most require prompt uotification to the entity that made the subaward, should the subrecipient such credible evidence regarding an "information -communication restriction." 2. Any subaward (at any tier) to a subrecipient that is either a State or a local govemmen: or a "public" institution of higher education must provide that the. subrecipient may not obligate award funds if, at the time of the obligation, the "program arse tivity" of the subrecipient (or of any further suob subrecipient at any tier) that is funded in whole or in part with award funds is subject to any "information -communication restriction." 3. Absentee express written determination by DOJ to the contrary, based upon a finding by DOI of compelling circumstances (e.g., a small amount of award funds obligated by therecipient at the time of a subrecipient's minor and transitory noncompliance, which was unknown to the recipient despite diligent monitoring), arty obligations of award funds that, under this condition, may not be made shall be unallowable costs for purposes ofthis award Inmakingany such determination, DOI will give great weight to evidence submitted by the recipient that demonstrates diligent monitoring of subrecipient compliance with the requirements set out in the award condition entitled "Ongoing compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373 is required." 4. Rules ofConstmction A. For purposes of this condition"informatioucomnemication resuictlen" ties tire meaning set out in the award condition entitled "Ongoing compliance with 8 U.S_C. 1373 is required." B. Both the" Rules of Construction" Rod the "Important Note" set out in the award condition entitled"Ongoing compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373 is required" are incorporated by reference asthough set forth here in fall. Our FORA 4000'2 (REV, q as) 20A-28