My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75D
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/19/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:16:37 PM
Creation date
11/13/2019 5:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
11/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
429
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
But residents in the nearby area remain worried the projects density would still be one of <br />the highest in the city next to single-family homes, on top of a current plan for 511 <br />parking spaces — an average of two parking spaces per apartment. <br />Since Vineyards submitted its initial proposal in October 2017, the City Council has sent <br />the project back to the Planning Commission, which in turn has rejected the project on <br />three different occasions. <br />"It's wrong in so many ways, this project." said resident Dale Helvig, who helped organize <br />the neighborhood's opposition to the project. <br />Helvig's group, known as the North Santa Ana Preservation Alliance, has mobilized the <br />project's critics to turn up to City Council meetings in large numbers. He said members of <br />his group and residents from all over the city will be at tonight's meeting. <br />Throughout the process, Ogulnick has attempted to appease homeowners with promises to <br />spend over $1 million on improvements and maintenance of the neighborhood's park, as <br />well as hiring 24-hour security to patrol around the building and the entire Park Santiago <br />area. <br />It remains to be seen how the Council will vote <br />Today's meeting will be the first one for newly -elected candidate Phil Buena, who <br />previously ran for and lost the seat in the 2018 election cycle. That year saw around <br />$320,000 in dark money spent in the election — part of which was in opposition of <br />Bacerra. <br />Bacerra over the phone declined to say which way he was leaning on the project. <br />Voice of OC revi usl re orted hasps//voi f g/2018/I I( r 'S1-BMu, <br />th2LrOuted-170000-t- m- 1 /Lthat the campaign committee that handled the dark <br />money spent against Bacerra was managed by a Northern California resident with family <br />connections to a Santa Ana lobbyist for the 2525 N. Main St. project. <br />Ogulnick has repeatedly nie any_ involvement with <br />the dark money g up lhttps-//voiceofoc.,g/2018/11/state- <br />invesdg ing-secretive-group-that-routed-17_0000-to-Santa-ana- <br />elec ion Z. <br />Bacerra — who has since been elected to the seat in this year's special election following the <br />resignation of his former Wr ent Roman R yna d//yoif g/2n ni q/�a <br />Lli'Bsfr - 'I/) — has in the past said he wouldnt have supported the <br />project for its location in Park Santiago, while indicating there would be better sites for it <br />in other parts of the city in this YouTube video from his camgw�gn p_aM <br />fhnya://www.vaurube com! ht"-n,.i,..2Kp�1 <br />He also in this year's special election got the endorsement of Park Santiago resident and <br />former council member Rob Richardson, as well as former council members Tom Lutz and <br />Alberta Christy, who are all opposed to the project. <br />ht I s:/Ivoiceofac.org/2019/111sant a -an a -city -council -set-to_ m=email&utm_term=0 6100b0e74b-069c808f74-279579229 11/19/19, 8:26 AM <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.