My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75D
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/19/2019
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75D
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:16:37 PM
Creation date
11/13/2019 5:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
11/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
429
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Richardson, Lutz and Christy— along with fellow former council members Dan Griset, <br />Lisa Mills, and Brett Franklin — sent a letter this week to Mayor Miguel Pulido and the <br />rest of the City Council urging them to strike down the apartments plan. <br />"In our experience, the number of development issues that have had this level of <br />opposition and consistent advocacy over the past 30 years can be numbered on perhaps one <br />hand," the council members' letter reads. <br />It goes on to describe the potential precedence the project's approval could sec "Should you <br />decide to approve an unwanted project after all that has transpired over two years ... The <br />larger consequence of putting the corrupting campaign money ahead of the quality of our <br />neighborhoods is significait." <br />It continues: `Who among you will stand up for Logan, Sandpointe, Santa Anita, Wilshire <br />Square, French Park, Saddleback View, Memorial Park, Washington Square or any other <br />neighborhood you could name when their turn comes to battle an unwanted development <br />backed by corrupting campaign money from dark sources and out of town interests?" <br />Now that Bacerras filled the vacant Ward 4 seat, Helvig said "it removes the possibility of a <br />tied vote and sending it back to the Planning Commission a fourth time." <br />Helvig said the project — on top of its controversial nature — has "turned heavily into <br />Santa Ana politics," adding that the Council's upcoming decision on the project could <br />determine "how were going to deal with these situations going forward." <br />"If it comes down to how much money a developer has to throw at issues," he added, Santa <br />Ana neighborhoods "are going to lose." <br />Brandon Pho it a Voice of OC intern. Contact him at bt+horaooice c o <br />(m4i1w.AphormuoireoPocorel or on Twitter @photherecord <br />https://voiceofoc.org/2019/11/santa-ana-city-caunciI-set-tD...m=email&utm term=0_6100bOe74b-069c808f74-279579229 11/19/19, 8:26 AM <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.