My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - PH - 2525 N MAIN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
11/19/2019
>
75D - PH - 2525 N MAIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 7:54:38 PM
Creation date
11/14/2019 5:55:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75D
Date
11/19/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EIR No. 2018-01, DA No. 2018-01, GPA No. 2018-06, AA No. 2018-10 <br />2525 North Main Street <br />November 19, 2019 <br />Page 8 <br />This project is required to comply with the City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance (HOO). To satisfy <br />the provisions of the HOO, applicant is proposing to pay an in -lieu fee in excess of $3,000,000. <br />See Table 4 below for a preliminary breakdown of the proposed HOO fee. <br />Table 4: Housing Opportunity Fee Summary <br />Habitable Square <br />Inclusionary Housing <br />Estimated <br />Previous Project <br />Footage <br />Fee <br />Fee <br />205,865 <br />$15 per square foot <br />$3,087,975 <br />$4,236,900 (282,460 <br />SF <br />'As measured from the exterior walls of the residential units. This calculation does not include <br />exterior hallways, common areas, landscape, open space or exterior stairways' <br />Environmental Impact Report <br />The applicant submitted a development proposal that requires the approval of several discretionary <br />applications. Given the size and location of the project, as well as the proposed zoning and general <br />plan modifications, extensive environmental review was needed. After completion of the Initial Study, <br />it was determined that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) required the preparation and <br />certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) for this project. The purpose of an EIR is to <br />identify the significant effects on the environment of a project, to identify alternatives to the project, <br />and to indicate the manner in which those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. To <br />determine what potential effects would be caused by the project, the EIR analyzed issues related to <br />Aesthetics; Air Quality; Biological Resources; Cultural/Historic Resources; Greenhouse Gas <br />Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Land Use and Planning; Noise; Population and <br />Housing; Public Services; Transportation and Circulation; Tribal Cultural Resources; Utilities and <br />Service Systems; and Energy. <br />On February 12, 2018, the Initial Study and Notice of Preparation were released to solicit comments <br />regarding the scope and content of the Draft EIR (DEIR). A scoping meeting was held on March 1, <br />2018 with approximately 164 people in attendance. A total of 163 written comment letters were <br />received at the conclusion of the 30-day public comment period. The comments were reviewed and <br />additional areas of analysis and studies were added to the scope of the Draft EIR as appropriate. <br />The comments are included as Appendix A of the Draft EIR. <br />The Draft EIR analyzed the direct and indirect impacts resulting from construction and operation of <br />the originally proposed 496-unit project. In addition to analyzing fourteen environmental topic areas, <br />the EIR also evaluated three options for access and egress to the project. The analysis included <br />Main Street access only as proposed (Option A), access from Main Street plus a secondary <br />access/egress driveway at the Main Street and Walkie Way/Santiago Park intersection (Option B), <br />and access/egress from both Main Street and Edgewood Road (Option C). <br />Three project alternatives were also analyzed within the document. These included a no build <br />alternative, where the existing office building would remain and be reoccupied by an office use <br />(Alternative 1); a reduced multi -family project consisting of a 30 percent reduction in density <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.