My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDANCE - 60A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
01/21/2020
>
CORRESPONDANCE - 60A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 12:12:41 PM
Creation date
1/21/2020 8:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
60A
Date
1/21/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�w <br />wr <br />wZ <br />2O <br />3= <br />W -� <br />Z❑ <br />0 <br />0 <br />7 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />structures. The proposed development would be 5-stories and be topped <br />with mezzanines reaching approximately 65 feet 8-inches in height. The <br />development would tier down to 2-stories (slightly over 20-feet in height) <br />on the eastern portion of the site. The residential units would be wrapped <br />around a 358,630 square foot central parking/fitness center/club room <br />structure with a roofline of approximately 90 feet from the ground surface, <br />which is the highest point of the proposed project. The project would result <br />in approximately 930,705 square feet of development and a density of 84 <br />dwelling units per acre. <br />15. On November 15, 2018, the City released the Final Environmental Impact Report <br />("Final EIR"). The City received hundreds of comments to that Final EIR, incorporated by <br />reference herein. The City failed to meaningfully respond to these comments. (See Final EIR, <br />pp. 3-1 to 7.) <br />16. On or about February 19, 2019, upon recommendation of the Santa Ana Planning <br />Commission ("Planning Commission") to deny the Initial Plan's application and certification of <br />the Final EIR, the City Council directed the Applicant to consult with the community and revise <br />its plans. (See City Council Minutes 2/19/2019.) <br />17. On information and belief, between February and June of 2019, Applicant <br />modified the Initial Plan. Ultimately, the modified Initial Plan proposed a 347-unit multi -family <br />residential development ("Second Plan"). Petitioner opposed this Second Plan, as it still did not <br />address or mitigate for the significant impacts. In the City's Clarification to the Final EIR dated <br />July 11, 2019 ("July Clarifications"), the City improperly rejected that the Final EIR needed to be <br />recirculated. (See Clarification to Final EIR, July 11, 2019, p. 1.) <br />18. On or about August 12, 2019, the Planning Commission's vote on the proposed <br />Second Plan resulted in an impasse (3 votes for, 3 votes against). (See Planning Commission <br />Minutes, Aug. 12, 2019.) The Applicant appealed the Project to the City Council. (Ibid.) <br />19. On information and belief, the Second Plan was then revised to the current Project, <br />an unrecognizable, rashly considered apartment complex that is a far cry from the Initial Plan <br />considered and evaluated in the Final EIR. The Project, in its present iteration, purports to <br />demolish the existing two-story, 81,172 square foot office building. In its stead, Applicant would <br />construct a 256-unit multi -family housing project on a 4.4 acre parcel at 58 dwelling units per <br />4516.101 / 8560319.1 <br />5- <br />VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE/MANDAMUS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.