My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - WORK STUDY_114 AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET_COMMENT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
10-14-19
>
3 - WORK STUDY_114 AND 117 EAST FIFTH STREET_COMMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2020 3:30:01 PM
Creation date
1/27/2020 3:29:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Policy 4.2 Encourage the retention and reuse of historical buildings and sites <br />COMMENT: The Applicant opposes retaining and reusing the highly significant Orange <br />County Title Company building. Applicant is aware that antique buildings are commonly <br />reused for permanent and rental housing, business and other uses. Most of the other <br />antique buildings in the Santa Ana Downtown, are currently in use. <br />REQUEST #6: Direct the Applicant to allow Toll Brothers the opportunity to explore the <br />historical integrity of the exterior of the Orange County Title Company building, and to allow <br />for the reuse of this building as part of the Toll Brothers residential development project. <br />THE URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT OF THE CITY‘S GENERAL PLAN <br />City Goal 2.0 Improve the physical appearance of the City through the development that <br />proportionally and aesthetically related to its district setting (page 4.4.14 Cultural Resources). <br />COMMENT: The project fails to follow Goal 2.0 because its proportions and aesthetics do not <br />reflect those in the historic Downtown. Instead the project sets aside the design, scale and <br />aesthetic of the Downtown and uses its own out-of-scale proportions and aesthetics to <br />negatively impact the Downtown in a way which will cause irreparable harm. <br />REQUEST #7: The City must turn down Applicant's project for its violation of its Goal 2.0. City <br />should direct the Applicant to redesign so it respects Goal 2.0, and the many other Goals and <br />Policies adopted by the City in its Transit Zoning Code EIR. <br />City Policy 2.3 Preservation involving the adaptive reuse of historic and architecturally <br />significant structures, is encouraged Citywide. <br />COMMENT: The City nor the Applicant support the adaptive reuse of the 1931 Art Deco, <br />Orange County Title Company building, even though the structure was in constant use as a <br />business from 1931 until recently. <br />REQUEST #8: Direct City to work with the Applicant to peel away a portion of the clad siding <br />from the west and north elevations so the integrity of the Orange County Title Company <br />building can be assessed. If the antique building exists under the metal cladding, I request <br />the antique structure be converted, as part of the Toll Brothers project, for use as a project <br />leasing office. <br />City Policy 2.4 New projects must respect the architectural style, scale, context, and rhythm of <br />Santa Ana‘s historic buildings and districts. <br />COMMENT: Applicant's project does not respect the architectural style, scale and context of <br />any of the historic buildings in the City, including those in the Downtown, as required by <br />Policy 2.4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.