My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25B - AGMT WITH CHAZEY PARTNERS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
02/04/2020
>
25B - AGMT WITH CHAZEY PARTNERS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2020 4:39:45 PM
Creation date
1/29/2020 4:34:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25B
Date
2/4/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Amend Agreement with Chazey Partners, Inc. <br />February 4, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />Chazey proceeded with the project in two phases, incorporating the expanded PWA operations. In <br />Phase 1, Chazey's assessment identified and prioritized stakeholder needs, quantified full-time <br />equivalent (FTE) effort and associated costs for PWA business processes, and benchmarked <br />current activities against peer organizations. Chazey conducted roundtables to gather current -state <br />process steps and to design future -state processes with PWA and other City agencies' input. <br />A key Phase 1 output was a prioritized Opportunity Matrix highlighting expected efficiencies from <br />business process improvement (Exhibit 2). The Opportunity Matrix included 62 potential <br />opportunities for process improvement across Public Works. Each opportunity was ranked for its <br />Benefit, Cost, Time, and Difficulty to implement and then were reviewed and prioritized with PWA <br />staff. This prioritized Opportunity Matrix was also reviewed with the project governance committee <br />that included the Executive Directors of the Public Works Agency, Finance & Management Services <br />Agency, as well as the Chief Technology Innovations Officer. <br />Phase 2 comprised the design, build, and implementation of identified process improvement <br />opportunities. The following four projects were selected for immediate implementation: <br />Consolidated Customer Invoice Statement: Provides a customer -friendly accounts <br />receivable statement for Public Works customers. Statements will be available "on -demand" <br />for PWA customers and include itemized invoice charges, applied payments and credits, <br />and aging buckets for amounts due. Prior to this, providing a consolidated statement <br />required a manual review of all customer invoices, researching and reconciling both <br />payments and credits assigned to each invoice, and then manually developing a statement <br />for the customer. Chazey staff has designed the statement document, completed the report <br />formatting, and will coordinate the upload into Lawson (the City's Enterprise Resource <br />Management system). <br />2. Automated Vendor Notifications: Using data and existing functionality in Lawson, Chazey <br />created an automated notification process for PWA vendors and the supporting engineering <br />administrative staff. These notifications will identify when vendor insurance coverage <br />expires, allowing the engineering department to be proactive in gathering the required <br />documentation without disrupting the vendor's planned engagement with the City. Prior to <br />this, a member of the PWA administrative staff was responsible for manually identifying the <br />expiration of coverage and contacting both the vendor and supporting City engineering staff <br />to update the documentation to reflect active insurance coverage. The streamlined process <br />will allow the engineering department staff members to work directly with the identified <br />vendor to keep them current. <br />3. Implementation of a Cycle Count Process: As part of the expanded Phase 1 scope, <br />Chazey identified a need for a regular cycle count process in the City's Central Stores <br />warehouse. Implementing a cycle count process is a best practice in which different portions <br />of inventory are physically checked on a continuous schedule. This process will help control <br />inventory shrinkage and manage accounting activity related to the inventory current. Chazey <br />developed the documentation, identified specific Lawson system requirements, and <br />prepared execution instructions for the warehouse staff. Prior to this, no regular cycle count <br />was performed and there was little documentation or support from Lawson for this process. <br />25B-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.