Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />Resolution No. _____ Page 24 of 76 <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson <br />Act contract? <br /> <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) <br /> <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site and vicinity is void of agricultural uses. No agricultural <br />zoning is located in the vicinity of the Project area and no parcels within the Project vicinity have <br />Williamson Act contracts. The Project would not conflict with a Williamson Act contract. The Project site <br />also does not contain any lands that are subject to Williamson Act contracts, either active or in nonrenewal. <br />(Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br /> <br />9.2.3 Forestland Zoning <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, <br />timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production? <br /> <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) <br /> <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not conflict with existing zoning, or cause rezoning of, <br />forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public <br />Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government <br />Code Section 51104(g)) because no forest land or timberland exists within the Project site and the Project <br />site is zoned for Professional (P) uses. (Initial Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same <br />reasons, to the Modified Project. <br /> <br />9.2.4 Loss of Forest Land <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non- <br />forest use? <br /> <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) <br /> <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site and vicinity is void of forestland or timberland. (Initial <br />Study, p. 18.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br /> <br />9.2.5 Conversion <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to <br />their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of <br />forest land to non-forest use? <br /> <br />Finding: No impact. (DEIR, p. 2-5; Initial Study, p. 18.) <br /> <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment <br />which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use or <br />conversion forest land to non-forest use because there is no existing farmland or forest land within or <br />adjacent to the Project site. No other changes to the existing environment would occur from <br />2-54