My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2 - EIR18-01; DA18-01; GPA18-06; AA18-10_2525 N MAIN STREET
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2019
>
10-28-19
>
2 - EIR18-01; DA18-01; GPA18-06; AA18-10_2525 N MAIN STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2020 2:52:36 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 2:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
726
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT A <br />Resolution No. _____ Page 49 of 76 <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order <br />to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? <br /> <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, p. 54.) <br /> <br />Facts in Support of Finding: As described in the Initial Study, the Project is required to pay fees for the <br />provision of school services pursuant to state law AB 2926. This fee would contribute to a fund that would <br />pay for new or expanded buildings, faculty, or equipment. Under state law, payment of school impact fees <br />constitutes mitigation for school facility impacts of projects and such payments are deemed to provide full <br />and complete school facilities mitigation. (Initial Study, p. 54.) <br /> <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />54.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br /> <br />9.14.4 Parks <br /> <br />Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the <br />provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered <br />governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order <br />to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? <br /> <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) <br /> <br />Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 3.0, Project Description, the Project includes <br />34,300 square feet of onsite exterior open space and recreation facilities that includes 5 recreation <br />courtyard areas that total 22,900 square feet and an 11,400-square foot amenity deck on the roof of the <br />parking structure. In addition, interior recreation facilities include a 5,397-square foot fitness center and a <br />1,566 square foot wellness pavilion. These onsite amenities are anticipated to meet many of the park and <br />recreation needs of Project residents. <br /> <br />The new residential population that would be generated from the Project is also anticipated to utilize <br />existing off-site park and recreation facilities. There is currently 93.8 acres of Santa Ana parkland within <br />3-miles of the Project site. Based on the existing amount of park and recreation facilities in the vicinity of <br />the Project site, the recreation facilities that would be provided as part of the Project, and the number of <br />residents at full capacity of the Project, the Project is not anticipated to require the provision of new or <br />physically altered park facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios. In addition, the Santa Ana <br />Municipal Code, Section 35-108 requires that residential development fees be paid for the acquisition, <br />construction, and renovation of park and recreation facilities to preserve an appropriate balance between <br />the demand by residents for use of park and recreational facilities and the availability of such facilities. <br />Thus, by payment of the required park fees, the Project would provide funding to offset any increased <br />usage at other park and recreation facilities. Overall, the Project would not result in substantial physical <br />deterioration of park and recreation facilities. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) <br /> <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue <br />would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) This <br />conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br /> <br />2-79
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.