Laserfiche WebLink
as well as in the eastern Los Angeles County cities of Baldwin Park and La Puente. With the <br />exception of West Hollywood, these tend to be areas of concentrated Black and/or Hispanic <br />population. In South LA, East LA, and Long Beach, there is a significant overlap between the <br />location of Public Housing developments and R/ECAPs. Other Multifamily developments are <br />proportionally concentrated in Los Angeles County as opposed to Orange County but are well <br />integrated throughout Los Angeles County. There is a significant number of Other Multifamily <br />developments in communities with West LA and the San Fernando Valley that tend to have <br />relatively little publicly supported housing overall. The part of the region (outside of Orange <br />County) with the least Other Multifamily housing is actually the predominantly Hispanic far <br />eastern portion of Los Angeles County. Project -Based Section 8 developments are also relatively <br />integrated throughout the region, albeit with a slightly higher concentration in Los Angeles County <br />than in Orange County. LIHTC developments are relatively integrated throughout the region but <br />with some concentration near Downtown LA. Downtown LA is fairly segregated and has a <br />concentration of R/ECAPs but is also subject to the most intense gentrification pressures in the <br />region. Housing Choice Voucher utilization is concentrated in South LA and adjacent communities <br />like Westmont, in Norwalk in southeastern Los Angeles County, in Lancaster and Palmdale in <br />northeastern Los Angeles County, and in Anaheim and Westminster within Orange County. There <br />is some overlap with the location of R/ECAPs although the pattern is not as pronounced as for <br />Public Housing. Areas with concentrations of voucher holders in Los Angeles County are <br />especially likely to be areas of Black population concentration. <br />i. Describe patterns in the geographic location for publicly supported housing that <br />primarily serves families with children, elderly persons, or persons with disabilities in <br />relation to previously discussed segregated areas or R/ECAPs in the jurisdiction and <br />region. <br />Families with children <br />Non -Targeted and Large Family developments are the most plentiful in the County, and are most <br />often concentrated in diverse, metropolitan pockets of the County. However, families with children <br />are more likely to occupy LIHTC units or use a Housing Choice Voucher than to reside in Other <br />Multifamily or Project -Based Section 8 units. In the broader region, publicly supported housing <br />for families with children across categories is comparatively likely to be located in RECAP areas <br />than in more integrated areas or predominantly White areas. <br />Elderly <br />In terms of elderly populations, a significant proportion of Project -Based Section 8 units house <br />elderly residents. Additionally, in Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, and San Juan Capistrano, all <br />publicly supported housing is either specifically reserved for seniors or records 90-100% elderly <br />residents in their statistics. Each of these communities are near the coast, driving up the cost of <br />real estate. San Juan Capistrano and Costa Mesa are more heavily White and Hispanic, while <br />Fountain Valley is more diverse and have a more significant Asian American or Pacific Islander <br />population. In the broader region, publicly supported housing for elderly residents across <br />categories is comparatively likely to be located in non -RECAP areas. <br />Persons with disabilities <br />In terms of residents with disabilities, there are LH3TC developments specifically reserved for <br />people with special needs in the Urban County (Jackson Aisle Apartments), Anaheim (Avenida <br />215 <br />75A-514 <br />