My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PUBLIC HEARING 5 YR CONSOLITATED PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
05/05/2020
>
75A - PUBLIC HEARING 5 YR CONSOLITATED PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2020 3:25:38 PM
Creation date
4/30/2020 3:09:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75A
Date
5/5/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
605
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Villas, Casa Alegre, Diamond Aisle Apartments), Fullerton (Fullerton Heights), Huntington Beach <br />(Pacific Sun Apartments), and Santa Ana (Guest House, Vista Del Rio). Additionally, the <br />percentage of people with disabilities occupying Other Multifamily units in the Urban County, <br />Fullerton, and Irvine is very high compared to the rest of the County. In the broader region, publicly <br />supported housing for persons with disabilities across categories is comparatively likely to be <br />located in non -RECAP areas. <br />ii. How does the demographic composition of occupants ofpublicly supported housing in <br />RECAPS compare to the demographic composition of occupants ofpublicly supported <br />housing outside ofRIECAPs in the jurisdiction and region? <br />Only jurisdictions which contain R/ECAPs have been pasted below. Rows with only 0 <br />and/or N/A values have been deleted for space <br />Table 48: Irvine <br />%Asian <br />% <br />Total # <br />or <br />Families <br />units <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />Pacific <br />with <br />% <br />%with a <br />Irvine <br />(occupied) <br />White <br />Black <br />Hispanic <br />Islander <br />children <br />Elderly <br />disability <br />Project -based <br />Section 8 <br />98 <br />60.00% <br />2.00% <br />9.00% <br />29.00% <br />16.83% <br />68.32% <br />6.93% <br />RECAP tracts <br />Non RECAP <br />619 <br />61.15% <br />2.95% <br />4.92% <br />30.82% <br />14.04% <br />60.45% <br />14.04% <br />tracts <br />Other <br />Multifamily <br />N/a <br />N/a <br />N/a <br />N/a <br />N/a <br />N/a <br />N/a <br />N/a <br />RECAP tracts <br />Non R/ECAP <br />22 <br />52.17% <br />26.09% <br />0.00% <br />21.74% <br />0.00% <br />50.00% <br />70.83% <br />tracts <br />HCV <br />Program <br />18 <br />85.00% <br />0.00% <br />5.00% <br />10.00% <br />0.00% <br />56.52% <br />43.48% <br />RECAP tracts <br />Non R/ECAP <br />955 <br />48.79% <br />18.08% <br />16.65% <br />16.20% <br />34.88% <br />36.00% <br />22.48% <br />tracts <br />There are only four R/ECAPs in Orange County, and they are all located in Irvine or Santa Ana. <br />However, there is only one publicly supported housing development located within one of those <br />R/ECAPs - Wakeham Grant Apartments (LIHTC), in Santa Ana. The data presented by HUD is <br />outdated, as it does not identify the same exact R/ECAPs as this analysis, but it is nevertheless <br />presented as it may give insight into former R/ECAPs which exhibit similar characteristics. Using <br />the former Irvine R/ECAPs, the occupancy of Project -Based Section 8 units was remarkably <br />similar both within and outside those tracts, with the exception of residents with a disability, who <br />were more plentiful outside of R/ECAPs. With regard to the Housing Choice Voucher Program, <br />the results were markedly different. Surprisingly, the proportion of all voucher holders that were <br />White within RECAPS was nearly double that outside of R/ECAPs. This is likely an aberration <br />216 <br />75A-515 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.