My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
05/05/2020
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 60A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 2:54:07 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:40:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
5/5/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orono, Norma <br />From: <br />Susie Melo <susie@xotango.com> <br />Sent: <br />Tuesday, May 05, 2020 3:24 PM <br />To: <br />eComment <br />Subject: <br />Eviction Moratorium - Delayed Eviction Process <br />Hello, <br />We are adamantly opposed to any form of eviction moratorium because many people are using this as a way to avoid <br />paying rent even if they can. This leaves us with the burden having to consult with attorneys and figure out how to deal <br />with these situations, adding yet another expense that we can't afford. This is only creating bigger problems while <br />enflaming tenant -landlord relations. When they end the moratorium there will be pandemonium in the <br />courthouses. This is the wrong solution that unfairly places the financial burden on the landlord, many of whom would <br />quickly become insolvent and unable to sustain their buildings if they don't collect their rent. The only solution is for our <br />government (Federal, State & Local) to provide a rent relief fund that directly goes towards paying rent. This could be in <br />the form of a grant for some and an interest free loan for others. <br />My husband and I own several rental properties in Santa Ana and we are very disturbed by the lack of regard for <br />landlords financial stability that recent mandates have created. My husband, an immigrant himself came here with only <br />$500 to his name and no one to help him. We are now seniors who depend 100% on our rent for survival and upkeep <br />of our properties. We have no mortgage to defer, so proposals to defer mortgages don't even consider us. Absent a <br />mortgage, we must still pay property taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance, repairs, license fees, inspection fees while <br />also having to pay all of our personal bills. <br />One of the most concerning aspects of this is that some (fortunately not all) tenants are taking this as a "get out of jail <br />free" card, and trying to avoid paying rent at all regardless of the reason. Tenants everywhere are screaming to simply <br />cancel rent. Then what?? Who pays our bills? Social media sites and television are just some evidence of how many <br />renters are encouraging other to just not pay —this is their chance to stick it to landlords! We have been told first hand <br />that some of our tenants are telling other tenants in the neighborhood to just not pay rent —just because they can. In <br />one specific case, a tenant who is still working has been intentionally making it difficult for us to collect rent for over <br />least 6 months. Now he is taking advantage of this opportunity to just say he doesn't have the money when we know <br />he's working (and collecting stimulus money) yet he fails to provide any proof of being financially affected by Covid- <br />19. He is also one of the one's actively encouraging others to do the same just to damage landlords. Unfortunately, <br />there are truly some people in need, however there is also a very large "entitlement" group that is just out to get <br />landlords and feeling empowered by these mandates. This must stop or there will be chaos and less available housing <br />for renters! The simple solution to stop the fighting is to put money directly in the hands of renters that can only be <br />applied towards rent. <br />Consider this — In Santa Ana where occupancy of a single family house is typically 5-9 people. In many cases multiple <br />people in the same household are collecting $3200/mo unemployment and don't want to return to work because they <br />are making more money now, yet there's no incentive to pay the rent. Landlords do not qualify for unemployment or <br />little else. <br />We need the City of Santa Ana to be on the right side of history and remove this burden from mom & pop landlords like <br />us. I hope you will consider our situation and find a more viable solution like I mentioned above. <br />Respectfully yours, <br />Nestor & Susie Melo <br />�S1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.