My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH ADOPT RESO FOR PR NO 15-6827
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
06/16/2020
>
75B - PH ADOPT RESO FOR PR NO 15-6827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2020 5:42:11 PM
Creation date
6/12/2020 2:55:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75B
Date
6/16/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NT <br />MENTS <br />INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FAIRVIEW BPIOGE REVLACEM REST TO STREET BEET) PROJECT <br />L S A <br />MAY 2020 (9Tx STREET To ANTx STREET) L, OLEGT <br />SANTA ANAL CALIFOPHIA <br />The Office of Historic Preservation Historic Property Data File includes properties in both Santa Ana <br />and Garden Grove. There are 18 listed properties in Santa Ana within 1 mi of the APE. All of the <br />properties are buildings constructed between 1898 and 1955. Seventeen of the buildings were <br />determined ineligible for National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listing, while one needs <br />reevaluation. In Garden Grove, the Historic Resources Inventory (HRI) identifies 11 properties with 1 <br />mi of the APE. These properties include nine buildings, an 1880 eucalyptus vat, and a 1976 storm <br />drain. The storm drain was determined ineligible for National Register listing, while the eucalyptus <br />vat needs reevaluation. The nine buildings were constructed between 1949 and 2000. All nine <br />buildings were determined to be ineligible for listing in the National Register. <br />The earliest available online aerial photograph of the area dates from 1953. It shows that although <br />there were residential housing tracts in the area, the land along what would become Fairview Street <br />was still open agricultural land except at the north where Westminster Avenue/17th Street is, and at <br />the south, where several buildings are just southwest of the current APE. A 1963 aerial photograph <br />is the first to show Fairview Street and the Fairview Street bridge. By 1963, tract housing existed <br />alongside the APE and the areas adjacent to the APE were more than half developed. A 1972 aerial <br />photograph shows that the Fairview Street Bridge is much larger than that depicted on the 1963 <br />aerial. The bridge on the 1972 aerial appears to be the currently existing bridge. By 1972, several <br />undeveloped areas existed adjacent to the APE, although these did not exist in the next available <br />aerial photograph dated 1995. Little change has occurred to the APE since 1995. <br />On March 16, 2018, LSA archaeologist Ivan Strudwick conducted a field survey of 3.92 ac of the total <br />11.93 ac APE. The survey areas consisted of approximately 2,650 ft of Fairview Street between <br />Westminster Avenue/17th Street and Civic Center Drive West. The APE is mainly a paved, developed <br />area, although patches of exposed sediment with some variation of ground visibility were found. <br />One archaeological resource, an isolated fragment of marine shell, was found during the survey. <br />Under CEQA, isolated finds are not considered important/significant resources. As such, the isolated <br />shell fragment is not important and requires no additional evaluation for the proposed Project. <br />On April 4, 2019, architectural historians Casey Tibbet and Eugene Heck conducted an intensive - <br />level pedestrian survey of the historic -period built environment in the APE. During the survey, Ms. <br />Tibbet took digital photographs of the exteriors of the historic -period buildings and features and <br />made detailed notations regarding their current conditions, integrity levels, physical characteristics, <br />and setting. In addition, Ms. Tibbet and Mr. Heck completed a reconnaissance -level survey of the <br />general setting and of the buildings and features. <br />3.5.2 Impact Analysis <br />a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource <br />pursuant to §15064.5? <br />No Impact. According to the HPSR, all resources were determined to be ineligible for listing in the <br />National Register and are not eligible to qualify as historical resources as defined in Section 15064.5 <br />of CEQA. As a result, there are no resources in the Project area that are considered historical <br />resources as defined in Section 15064.5 of CEQA. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a <br />substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Therefore, no impacts to <br />R:\WKE1702\ISMND\Fina1 ISMND\Fairview Street Bridge Final ISMND7,05SM6 5 3-31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.