My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Appendix A Noise Study Report
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
06/16/2020
>
75B - FAIRVIEW BRIDGE PROJECT CD
>
Appendix A Noise Study Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2020 8:39:10 AM
Creation date
6/16/2020 8:18:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
6/16/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4. Federal, State, and Local Policies and Procedures <br />........................................................................... <br />4.1.2. Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol for New Highway Construction <br />and Reconstruction Projects <br />The Caltrans Protocol specifies the policies, procedures, and practices to be used by <br />agencies that sponsor new construction or reconstruction of federal or federal -aid <br />highway projects. The NAC specified in the Protocol are the same as those specified <br />in 23 CFR 772. The Protocol defines a noise increase as "substantial" when the <br />predicted noise levels under build conditions exceed existing noise levels by 12 dBA. <br />The Protocol also states that a sound level is considered to approach an NAC level <br />when the sound level is within 1 dB of the NAC identified in 23 CFR 772 <br />(e.g., 66 dBA is considered to approach the NAC of 67 dBA, but 65 dBA is not). <br />The Caltrans TeNS (September 2013) and the Protocol provide detailed technical <br />guidance for the evaluation of highway traffic noise. This includes field measurement <br />methods, noise modeling methods, and report preparation guidance. <br />4.2. State Regulations and Policies <br />4.2.1. California Environmental Quality Act <br />Noise analysis under CEQA may be required regardless of whether the proposed <br />Project is a Type 1 project. The CEQA noise analysis is completely independent of <br />the 23 CFR 772 analysis done for NEPA. Under CEQA, the baseline noise level is <br />compared to the build noise level. The assessment entails looking at the existing <br />setting and how large or perceptible any noise increase would be in a given area. Key <br />considerations include the uniqueness of the setting, the sensitive nature of the noise <br />receptors, the magnitude of the noise increase, the number of residences affected, and <br />the absolute noise level. <br />The significance of noise impacts under CEQA are addressed in the environmental <br />document rather than in the NSR. Even though the NSR (or noise technical <br />memorandum) does not specifically evaluate the significance of noise impacts under <br />CEQA, it must contain the technical information that is needed to make that <br />determination in the environmental document. <br />4.2.2. Section 216 of the California Streets and Highways Code <br />Section 216 of the California Streets and Highways Code relates to the noise effects <br />of a proposed freeway project on public and private elementary and secondary <br />schools. Under this code, a noise impact occurs if, as a result of a proposed freeway <br />project, noise levels exceed 52 dBA Leq(h) in the interior of public or private <br />elementary or secondary school classrooms, libraries, multipurpose rooms, or spaces. <br />Fairview Street Improvements from 9th Street to 16th Street 19 <br />and Bridge Replacement Project Noise Study Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.